Back

TELF: An End-to-End Temporal Encoder with Late Fusion for Interpretable Disease Risk Prediction from Longitudinal Real-World Data

Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.

2026-04-06 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.04.26350180 medRxiv
Show abstract

Deep learning models utilizing longitudinal healthcare data have significantly advanced epidemiological research. However, contemporary transformer-based models increasingly rely on computationally intensive pre-training steps that entail processing massive real-world datasets with cost-prohibitive hardware. We introduce the Temporal Encoder with Late Fusion (TELF), a lightweight end-to-end predictive model featuring an encoder-only architecture for processing medical codes, followed by post-encoder concatenation with demographic variables. TELF learns code embeddings on-the-fly, thereby bypassing the resource-intensive pre-training bottleneck. Furthermore, its late-fusion design preserves the integrity of the temporal attention mechanism before integrating static demographic predictors. We evaluated TELF using an administrative claims database across three distinct cohorts: pancreatic cancer (n=53,661), type 2 diabetes (n=78,756), and heart failure (n=72,540). TELF consistently outperformed traditional machine learning baselines, including XGBoost, LightGBM, and logistic regression. Specifically, TELF achieved AUCs of 0.9150, 0.8199, and 0.8721 for pancreatic cancer, type 2 diabetes, and heart failure, respectively, compared with 0.9044, 0.7908, and 0.8535 for XGBoost and 0.9014, 0.7800, and 0.8466 for logistic regression. Beyond predictive superiority, TELF's isolated temporal attention mechanism enables population-level motif mining. By extracting high-attention temporal sequences, we mapped aggregated patient journey pathways, revealing interpretable clinical trajectories preceding disease onset. Collectively, these results demonstrate that TELF provides a resource-efficient and accessible framework for advanced temporal modeling in clinical and epidemiological research.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.