Back

The optimal second arterial graft and sex differences in coronary bypass surgery: 10-year national registry results

Beukers, S.; Daeter, E.; Kelder, H.; Houterman, S.; Kloppenburg, G.

2026-04-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.04.26350161 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Disparities between sexes in mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting remain incompletely understood. Multi-arterial grafting demonstrates superior outcome compared to single arterial grafting, although the optimal type of a second arterial graft and possible sex-dependent differences in grafting strategy have not been elucidated. We aim to determine whether the right internal thoracic artery or the radial artery is the optimal second arterial graft. Methods We analyzed data from 14,196 patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with the left internal thoracic artery and either right internal thoracic artery or radial artery between 2013 and 2022 from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Patients were stratified by sex and type of second arterial graft. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included short-term complications and repeat revascularization. Results In both sexes, the choice of second arterial graft did not significantly impact long-term survival. Postoperative arrhythmias were more prevalent in both sexes following right internal thoracic artery use (p<0.001). The radial artery was associated with higher rate of repeat revascularization in men (p=0.044 at 5 years follow-up) and more cerebrovascular accidents in women (0.9% vs 0.2%, p=0.028). Conclusion The choice of second arterial graft did not affect long-term survival in either sex. The radial artery was associated with an increased risk of repeat revascularization in men and more cerebrovascular accidents in women. These results underscore the need for further research in the field of sex-specific considerations in operative strategy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.0%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
5
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.1%
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
8
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
10
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
13
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%