A Context-Aware Single-Cell Proteomics Analysis pipeline.
Salomo Coll, C.; Makar, A. N.; Brenes, A. J.; Inns, J.; Trost, M.; Rajan, N.; Wilkinson, S.; von Kriegsheim, A.
Show abstract
Single-cell proteomics (SCP) by mass spectrometry can now quantify hundreds to thousands of proteins per cell, but the field still lacks standardised analytical pipelines that accommodate the diversity of instruments, sample preparation workflows and biological contexts encountered in practice. Existing workflows, largely adapted from single-cell transcriptomics, do not account for the informative missingness, pervasive ambient protein contamination and limited feature space that distinguish proteomic from transcriptomic data. In addition, cell type annotation remains a manual bottleneck that is subjective, difficult to reproduce and hard to scale. Here we present an end-to-end pipeline that integrates adaptive quality control, entropy-guided iterative batch correction, multi-modal marker discovery that exploits detection patterns unique to proteomics, and context-aware annotation by large language models (LLMs) coupled to structured contradiction reasoning and orthogonal data-driven validation. Benchmarking on published single-cell proteomic datasets from developing human brain and glioblastoma-associated neutrophils revealed systematic LLM failure modes, including context-insensitive marker vocabulary and misinterpretation of phagocytic or lytic cell states. We addressed these errors using a three-round prompt architecture that combines general biological principles with auto-generated dataset-specific constraints. In held-out validation on a skin tumour dataset acquired, the pipeline showed high concordance with FACS-sorted ground truth. In the caerulein-injured pancreas, orthogonal immunohistochemistry further supported annotations of macrophage, stellate and immune populations. The pipeline is fully automated under fixed settings, and available as Context-Aware Single-Cell Proteomics Analysis (CASPA), providing SCP laboratories and facilities with a reproducible workflow that delivers interpretable, confidence-quantified annotations suitable for downstream expert review.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.