Electronic Health Record-Based Estimation of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Scores in Heart Failure
Kim, Y. W.; Lau, W.; Patel, N.; Kendrick, K.; Wu, A.; Feldman, T.; Ahern, R.; Oka, A.
Show abstract
Background: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure for heart failure. However, its clinical utility is limited by incomplete and inconsistent data collection. We aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to estimate KCCQ overall summary scores from electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods: We assembled a retrospective cohort of 10,889 heart failure patients with recorded KCCQ scores from the Truveta database. Predictor features were derived from structured EHR variables across 13 historical time windows (15-360 days). Multiple regression algorithms were evaluated, followed by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based feature reduction and nested cross-validation for hyperparameter optimization. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and ordinal discrimination and calibration for categorical severity classification. Results: Histogram-based gradient boosting (HGB) with HGB-SHAP feature selection achieved the strongest performance, reducing feature dimensionality by more than 94\% while maintaining estimation accuracy. The 240-day window performed best (R2=0.522, MAE=12.485). For categorical severity classification, the model demonstrated strong ordinal discrimination (mean ordinal AUROC=0.850). Quantile-based calibration improved classification balance, increasing the F1-score for the most severe category (KCCQ<25) from 0.180 to 0.428 and the quadratic weighted kappa from 0.601 to 0.640. Longer EHR observation windows were associated with improved prediction performance. Conclusion: Machine learning models can estimate KCCQ scores from routine EHR data with clinically meaningful accuracy and strong discriminatory performance. This approach may help extend assessment of patient-reported health status to populations in which survey-based data are incompletely captured, supporting population-level cardiovascular outcomes assessment and risk stratification in heart failure care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AI Learning for Pediatric Right Ventricular Assessment: Development and Validation Across Multiple Centers 92%
- Machine Learning Generalizability Across Healthcare Settings: Insights from multi-site COVID-19 screening 92%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 93%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 92%
- Detecting QT prolongation From a Single-lead ECG With Deep Learning 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of Phenotype Classifiers across Multiple Sites in the Observational Health Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) Network 94%
- Real-Time Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study 93%
- Machine Learning Approaches for Electronic Health Records Phenotyping: A Methodical Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records 94%
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 93%
- Evaluation of a Machine Learning Approach Utilizing Wearable Data for Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 95%
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 94%
- Latent class regression improves the predictive acuity and clinical utility of survival prognostication amongst chronic heart failure patients. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.