Cannabis, ENDS, and Tobacco Co-use and Co-exposures Among ECHO Adolescents and Emerging Adults
Appleseth, H.; Felt, J.; Cohn, A. M.; Schmidt, R. J.; Croff, J. M.; Leffingwell, T. R.
Show abstract
Importance: Understanding patterns of substance use and environmental exposures to tobacco, cannabis, and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among youth is critical for developing targeted prevention strategies, particularly as co-use of tobacco, ENDS, and cannabis becomes more prevalent. Objective: To identify latent classes of tobacco, ENDS, and cannabis use, and environmental exposures to these products among adolescents and emerging adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) consortium (3rd data release, 2018 to 2022) were analyzed from March 2025 to January 2026. The sample (N=2,786) included early adolescents (ages 11 to 13; n=226, 7.9%), middle adolescents (ages 14 to 17; n=1,248, 43.4%), and late adolescents/emerging adults (ages 18 to 24; n=1,402, 48.7%) from 19 ECHO cohorts. Main Outcomes and Measures: The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, Substance Use module measured experimental and current use of cannabis, ENDS, and tobacco products, as well as daily environmental exposure to tobacco smoke, nicotine aerosols, and cannabis smoke within home and social contexts. A multiple group latent class analysis was used to identify distinct latent classes of substance use and environmental exposure to tobacco smoke, nicotine aerosols, and cannabis smoke and compared class prevalences across early, middle, and late adolescence. Results: Four latent classes were identified, including: No Use/No Exposure (53%), No Use, Polyexposure (10%), Experimental Use/Low Exposure (22%), and Polysubstance Use/High Polyexposure (14%). Cannabis was the most used substance (34% experimental or current use) and the most common source of environmental exposure (20%), followed by ENDS use (26% experimental or current use; 19% environmental exposure) and combustible tobacco (15% use; 19% environmental exposure). The No Use/No Exposure and No Use/Polyexposure classes were primarily made up of early and middle-aged adolescents, whereas the Experimental Use/Low Exposure and Polysubstance Use/High Polyexposure classes primarily consisted of late adolescents and emerging adults. Conclusions: Our study revealed distinct, developmentally patterned groupings of substance use and environmental exposure among US adolescents and emerging adults, highlighting the need for developmentally tailored interventions, messaging, and policies that address both active use and environmental exposure across adolescence.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Youth susceptibility to tobacco use: Is it general or specific? 98%
- Improving on estimates of the relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking 93%
- Characterization of Trajectories of Physical Activity and Cigarette Smoking from Early Adolescence to Adulthood 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in injecting versus smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine among people who inject drugs in San Diego, California, 2020 to 2023 94%
- Testing the association between tobacco and cannabis use and cognitive functioning: Findings from an observational and Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Agreement between DSM-IV and DSM-5 measures of substance use disorders in a sample of adult substance users 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey 95%
- Effect of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems on Cigarette Abstinence in Smokers with no Plans to Quit: Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 93%
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.