Back

Experiential acceptance during an episode of anxiety: Conceptualizing the process of acceptance through a qualitative study

Ribeyron, J.; Duriez, N.; Shankland, R.

2026-04-08 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.03.26346604 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Experiential acceptance refers to the capacity to be open to internal experiences without attempting to change or avoid them. Although acceptance is a core emotion regulation strategy within mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions (MABIs) and a protective factor for mental health, its conceptualization and implementation remain unclear and ambiguous. The aim of this study was to clarify and develop a comprehensive model of accepting anxiety. Method Twenty-six participants from a non-clinical sample with prior experience in MABIs took part in semi-structured interviews exploring their experience of accepting anxiety. Data collection and analysis followed the principles of Grounded Theory to generate a data-driven model of the acceptance process. Results We identified a five-stage dynamic model involving distinct processes: (Stage 1) observing through the body with attentional focus on interoceptive experience; (Stage 2) identifying and acknowledging anxiety; (Stage 3) validating and normalizing the experience through validation and self-compassion; (Stage 4) not reacting characterized by decentering and nonreactivity; and (Stage 5) staying with the experience via exposure. We also identified facilitating factors that support engagement in the acceptance process. Conclusion These findings refine the understanding of acceptance as a multidimensional emotion regulation process by highlighting an active dynamic involving multiple mechanisms underlying the acceptance of anxiety. This model provides a framework for developing more targeted clinical interventions and for investigating individual and contextual variability in these subprocesses.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.