Enhancing Medical Knowledge in Large Language Models via Supervised Continued Pretraining on Clinical Notes
Weissenbacher, D.; Shabbir, M.; Campbell, I. M.; Berdahl, C. T.; Gonzalez-Hernandez, G.
Show abstract
Background: Large language models (LLMs) contain limited professional medical knowledge, as large-scale training on clinical text has not yet been possible due to restricted access. Objectives: To continue pre-training an open-access instruct LLM on de-identified medical notes and evaluate the resulting impact on real-world clinical decision-making tasks and standard benchmarks. Methods: Using 500K de-identified clinical notes from Cedars-Sinai Health System, we fine-tuned a Qwen3-4B Instruct model with supervised learning to generate medical decision-making (MDM) paragraphs from patient presentations, and evaluated it on assigned-diagnosis prediction, in-hospital cardiac-arrest mention detection, and a suite of general and biomedical benchmarks. Results: The fine-tuned model produced MDMs that closely resembled those written by physicians and outperformed the base-instruct model and larger clinically untrained models (Qwen3-32B and Llama-3.1-405B Instruct) on assigned-diagnosis prediction, the task most aligned with its training objective. On the task of detecting in-hospital cardiac arrest mentions, the model initially exhibited mild label collapse, but a brief task-specific fine-tuning stage resolved this issue and allowed it to surpass all competitors. The model also demonstrated global general knowledge retention on biomedical and general-domain evaluation benchmarks compared to the baseline. Conclusion: Supervised full fine-tuning on clinical notes allowed the model to incorporate medical knowledge without sacrificing general-domain abilities, and to transfer this knowledge to unseen biomedical tasks without wholesale loss of general-domain abilities, while revealing collapse-related failure modes that motivate more principled strategies for clinical specialization.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 95%
- Performance of Generative Pretrained Transformer on the National Medical Licensing Examination in Japan 93%
- Evaluating Anti-LGBTQIA+ Medical Bias in Large Language Models 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.