Back

Phonemic awareness deficits in an alphasyllabary language: Effects of task type and linguistic complexity in children with Specific Learning Disorder-Reading

Soman, A.; Dev, S. S.; Ravindren, R.

2026-04-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.02.26349894 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Phonemic awareness deficits are a core feature of Specific Learning Disorder-Reading (SLD-R). How task- and language-specific factors influence these deficits in alphasyllabary languages may help clarify the cognitive mechanisms underlying reading impairment in SLD-R. Methods Thirty children with a DSM-5 diagnosis of SLD-R (mean age 11.4 years) and 29 age-matched typically developing children were given phoneme blending (words and pseudowords) and segmentation tasks in Malayalam. The effects of age and consonant clusters on task performance were evaluated. Results Children with SLD-R performed significantly worse than controls across most phonemic awareness tasks, with the largest deficits observed in pseudoword blending and word blending, and smaller deficits in segmentation. No significant difference was observed for initial phoneme deletion. In typically developing children, age showed strong positive correlations with phonemic performance across most tasks, whereas the SLD-R group showed weak or absent correlations, except in word blending and initial phoneme deletion. Consonant clusters significantly affected performance in both groups, with SLD-R showing more severe deficits. Conclusions Phonemic awareness deficits observed in SLD-R in alphasyllabary languages like Malayalam are more prominent in tasks where lexical support is absent, like pseudoword blending. These deficits vary across task types and linguistic complexity. Phonemic awareness improves with age in typically developing children, while improvement is uneven in children with SLD-R. The findings suggest that phonemic awareness deficits are a core feature of SLD-R across languages, but their manifestation is shaped by orthographic and linguistic characteristics of the writing system.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.4%
2
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.3%
6
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%