Back

Evaluation of non-sputum-based diagnostics for pediatric tuberculosis: the Pediatric TB Diagnostic (PDTBDx) cohort protocol

Mullen, B.; Githua, J.; Escudero, J. N.; Mecha, J.; Kijaro, L.; Ndunge, M.; Muriithi, M.; Kibet, I.; John-Stewart, G.; Maleche-Obimbo, E.; Nduba, V.; LaCourse, S. M.

2026-04-03 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.04.01.26350011 medRxiv
Show abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children and adolescents, causing 172,000 deaths in 2024 in children and adolescents worldwide. Diagnostic challenges are pronounced in pediatrics, in which collecting respiratory specimens is challenging and TB is often paucibacillary, leading to delayed diagnosis and increased mortality. We describe the protocol and methodology of the Pediatric TB Diagnostic (PDTBDx) cohort, a study with the primary aim of evaluating non-sputum-based TB diagnostics for diagnosis and treatment response in children. This is a prospective observational cohort study of >400 children recruited from inpatient and outpatient clinical sites in Nairobi, Kenya. Children <15 years presenting to study clinical sites with TB symptoms will be considered for enrollment as symptomatic participants. Enrolled participants will undergo rigorous clinical assessment and longitudinal follow-up to ensure appropriate diagnostic classification by NIH consensus statement guidelines for pediatric TB. Baseline evaluation includes symptom assessment, chest x-ray, HIV testing, respiratory TB culture and GeneXpert Ultra, and urine LAM. Subsequent visits occur at week 2, months 1, 2, 4, 6,12 and 24. Blood and urine specimens will be collected at baseline and at follow-up visits for storage for evaluation of novel diagnostic assays, including exosome-based and CRISPR-based TB biomarkers. This large, prospective cohort of pediatric participants with and without TB follows a consistent and rigorous protocol for diagnosing childhood TB, in concordance with internationally recognized guidelines. Assays evaluated in PDTBDx will guide improved diagnostic strategies for pediatric TB.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
17
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%