Back

Measuring the impact of lived experience and caregiver engagement in research on the research conducted: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool

Hawke, L. D.; Hou, J.; Upham, K.; van Kesteren, M. R.; Munro, C.; Hauer, S.; Sendanyoye, C.; Halsall, T.; Quilty, L.; Hamilton, C.; Barbic, S. P.; Wang, W.

2026-04-03 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349956 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. People with lived/living experience of health conditions, as well as caregivers, are increasingly engaged in research. This study aimed to develop and pilot test a new tool measuring the impact of lived/living experience engagement on the research. The measure is called the Measure of Engagement Tool for Research and lived Experience (METRE). Method. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study among 28 people with lived/living experience and caregivers and 12 academic researchers to understand the impacts of engagement. Using the findings, we drafted the METRE. We pilot tested the METRE among 13 people with lived/living experience and caregivers and 10 academic researchers. Insights were used to refine the scale. Results. Qualitatively, participants identified multiple domains of impact of engagement on research, which guided scale development. Pilot testing of the draft METRE revealed it being straightforward to complete, providing a thorough evaluation of the impact of engagement. However, some areas of improvement were recommended. The draft items showed acceptable preliminary performance. Conclusions. An assessment tool is now available to assess the impact of lived/living experience engagement on the research. Additional research is required to evaluate its psychometric properties. Tools to evaluate the impact of engagement on research will help advance the science of engagement and support engaged research teams in their work.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.2%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
3
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
5
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
12
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
22
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%