Measuring the impact of lived experience and caregiver engagement in research on the research conducted: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool
Hawke, L. D.; Hou, J.; Upham, K.; van Kesteren, M. R.; Munro, C.; Hauer, S.; Sendanyoye, C.; Halsall, T.; Quilty, L.; Hamilton, C.; Barbic, S. P.; Wang, W.
Show abstract
Background. People with lived/living experience of health conditions, as well as caregivers, are increasingly engaged in research. This study aimed to develop and pilot test a new tool measuring the impact of lived/living experience engagement on the research. The measure is called the Measure of Engagement Tool for Research and lived Experience (METRE). Method. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study among 28 people with lived/living experience and caregivers and 12 academic researchers to understand the impacts of engagement. Using the findings, we drafted the METRE. We pilot tested the METRE among 13 people with lived/living experience and caregivers and 10 academic researchers. Insights were used to refine the scale. Results. Qualitatively, participants identified multiple domains of impact of engagement on research, which guided scale development. Pilot testing of the draft METRE revealed it being straightforward to complete, providing a thorough evaluation of the impact of engagement. However, some areas of improvement were recommended. The draft items showed acceptable preliminary performance. Conclusions. An assessment tool is now available to assess the impact of lived/living experience engagement on the research. Additional research is required to evaluate its psychometric properties. Tools to evaluate the impact of engagement on research will help advance the science of engagement and support engaged research teams in their work.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 96%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Informal caregiving following stroke: a qualitative exploration of carer self-identification, care-related language and support experiences 95%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 94%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 94%
- “I can be a source of motivation”: Perspectives from stakeholders of the I’mPossible fellowship, a peer-led differentiated service delivery model for adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV in India 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public involvement to enhance care home research; collaboration on a minimum data set for care homes 94%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 94%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 95%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 93%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.