Back

CorSeg-CineSAX: An Open-Source Deep Learning Framework for Fully Automatic Segmentation of Short-Axis Cine Cardiac MRI Across Multiple Cardiac Diseases

Xu, R.; Jiang, S.; Zhai, Y.; Chen, Y.

2026-04-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349955 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Segmentation of the left ventricular myocardium, left ventricular cavity, and right ventricular cavity on short-axis cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images is essential for quantifying cardiac structure and function. However, existing automated segmentation tools are limited by small training datasets, narrow disease coverage, restrictive input format requirements, and the absence of anatomical plausibility constraints, hindering their clinical adoption. Methods: We constructed the largest annotated CMR short-axis segmentation dataset to date, comprising 1,555 subjects from 12 centers with five cardiac disease types and full cardiac cycle annotations totaling 319,175 labeled images. A MedNeXt-L model was trained using a 2D slice-by-slice strategy with full field-of-view input, eliminating dependencies on 3D volumes, temporal sequences, or region-of-interest(ROI) localization. A deterministic three-step post-processing pipeline was designed to enforce anatomical priors: connected component constraint, containment relationship constraint, and gap-filling constraint. The model was validated on an internal test set (310 subjects) and three independent public external datasets (ACDC, M&Ms1, M and Ms2; 855 subjects from 6 additional centers across 3 countries), spanning 15 cardiac disease categories-10 of which were never encountered during training. Results: The model achieved mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.913 {+/-} 0.037 and 0.911 {+/-} 0.040 on internal and external test sets, respectively, with a cross-domain performance gap of only 0.002. Post-processing eliminated all containment violations (7.5% [->] 0%) and gap errors (1.8% [->] 0%) while reducing fragment rates by 85.5% (9.0% [->] 1.3%). Zero-shot generalization to 10 unseen disease categories yielded DSC values ranging from 0.899 to 0.921. Automated clinical functional parameters demonstrated excellent agreement with manual measurements for left ventricular indices and right ventricular volumes (intraclass correlation coefficients [≥] 0.977). Conclusions: CorSeg-CineSAX provides a robust, open-source framework for fully automatic CMR short-axis segmentation across diverse clinical scenarios. All source code and pre-trained weights are publicly available at https://github.com/RunhaoXu2003/CorSeg.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.3%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
3
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
9
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
11
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
12
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
13
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
16
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%