Back

CorSeg-CineSAX: An Open-Source Deep Learning Framework for Fully Automatic Segmentation of Short-Axis Cine Cardiac MRI Across Multiple Cardiac Diseases

Xu, R.; Jiang, S.; Zhai, Y.; Chen, Y.

2026-04-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349955 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Segmentation of the left ventricular myocardium, left ventricular cavity, and right ventricular cavity on short-axis cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images is essential for quantifying cardiac structure and function. However, existing automated segmentation tools are limited by small training datasets, narrow disease coverage, restrictive input format requirements, and the absence of anatomical plausibility constraints, hindering their clinical adoption. Methods: We constructed the largest annotated CMR short-axis segmentation dataset to date, comprising 1,555 subjects from 12 centers with five cardiac disease types and full cardiac cycle annotations totaling 319,175 labeled images. A MedNeXt-L model was trained using a 2D slice-by-slice strategy with full field-of-view input, eliminating dependencies on 3D volumes, temporal sequences, or region-of-interest(ROI) localization. A deterministic three-step post-processing pipeline was designed to enforce anatomical priors: connected component constraint, containment relationship constraint, and gap-filling constraint. The model was validated on an internal test set (310 subjects) and three independent public external datasets (ACDC, M&Ms1, M and Ms2; 855 subjects from 6 additional centers across 3 countries), spanning 15 cardiac disease categories-10 of which were never encountered during training. Results: The model achieved mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.913 {+/-} 0.037 and 0.911 {+/-} 0.040 on internal and external test sets, respectively, with a cross-domain performance gap of only 0.002. Post-processing eliminated all containment violations (7.5% [->] 0%) and gap errors (1.8% [->] 0%) while reducing fragment rates by 85.5% (9.0% [->] 1.3%). Zero-shot generalization to 10 unseen disease categories yielded DSC values ranging from 0.899 to 0.921. Automated clinical functional parameters demonstrated excellent agreement with manual measurements for left ventricular indices and right ventricular volumes (intraclass correlation coefficients [≥] 0.977). Conclusions: CorSeg-CineSAX provides a robust, open-source framework for fully automatic CMR short-axis segmentation across diverse clinical scenarios. All source code and pre-trained weights are publicly available at https://github.com/RunhaoXu2003/CorSeg.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
52.3%
50% of probability mass above
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
4
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
7
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
8
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
13
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
15
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%