Back

Chinese College Student Gamers Cohort (CCSGC): Multimodal Longitudinal Insights into Internet Gaming Disorder's Biopsychosocial Mechanisms and Risk Trajectories

Yuchen, H.; Guangdong, Z.; Yifan, L.; Shitong, X.; Qihong, Z.; Zifeng, W.; Yixuan, S.; Wangyue, L.; Taoyu, W.; Shiqiu, M.; Yanhui, L.; Tianye, J.; Jie, S.; Yan, S.

2026-04-01 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349949 medRxiv
Show abstract

Internet gaming disorder (IGD) presents a significant public health challenge, yet its complex biopsychosocial mechanisms and dynamic risk trajectories remain poorly understood due to a scarcity of comprehensive longitudinal and multimodal cohorts. To address this critical gap, we established the Chinese College Student Gamers Cohort (CCSGC), a prospective, multimodal longitudinal study of 793 first-year undergraduates primarily playing Honor of Kings from 2022 Sept. The CCSGC integrates semi-annual psychosocial questionnaires, annual neuroimaging (EEG/fMRI), and biospecimen collection over multiple years. Baseline data revealed individuals with IGD (n=211) exhibited significantly higher gaming craving, psychological distress (depression, anxiety), impulsivity, and maladaptive motivational features compared to non-IGD gamers (regular players (RP) n=400; casual players (CP) n=182). Longitudinal analyses across four waves indicated bidirectional temporal associations between IGD severity and mental symptoms, and a stabilization of IGD incidence after an initial decrease. Furthermore, specific neurophysiological (e.g., N400 amplitude to game cues) and neuroimaging (e.g., superior parietal activation) markers were identified that correlated with IGD severity and predicted one-year outcomes in gaming disorder or social functioning. The CCSGC provides an invaluable resource for dissecting the heterogeneity, comorbidity, and intricate biopsychosocial mechanisms of IGD, holding significant potential to advance risk prediction, early identification, and targeted intervention strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.