Back

RNase HII-assisted amplification (RHAM) for rapid point-of-care monkeypox detection

Kamhieh-Milz, J.; Kamhieh-Milz, S.; Schwarz, F.; Michel, J.; Nitsche, A.; Puyskens, A.

2026-04-02 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349928 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mpox poses an ongoing global public health threat, with case numbers rising beyond traditionally endemic regions in Central and Western Africa. Rapid detection of the causative agent, the Monkeypox virus (MPXV), is critical for outbreak control, yet laboratory infrastructure and trained personnel remain scarce in many affected areas. Point-of-care molecular diagnostics offer a practical solution by enabling timely testing without specialized equipment or elaborate nucleic acid extraction. We evaluated the performance of an extraction-free RNase HII-assisted amplification (RHAM) assay for MPXV detection by Pluslife Biotech, a novel isothermal amplification technology providing results in under 30 minutes. The Pluslife RHAM test demonstrated pan-MPXV clade reactivity, detecting all four MPXV clades (Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb) with high analytical sensitivity and no cross-reactivity to other poxviruses or other clinically relevant pathogens. The assay proved compatible with diverse clinical specimen types, including lesion swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, rectal swabs, urine, semen, and wound exudate. As part of routine diagnostics at the German Consultant Laboratory for Poxviruses, in a comprehensive evaluation of 206 clinical specimens against diagnostic real-time PCR, the Pluslife RHAM test achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 94.2% (95% CI: 85.8-98.4%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 97.3-100%). Notably, samples with higher viral loads (Ct <30) showed 100% sensitivity. Time-to-result correlated significantly with viral load, enabling faster diagnosis in high-viral-load cases. The Pluslife RHAM test represents a practical, sensitive, and rapid point-of-care solution for MPXV detection in resource-limited settings, combining strong analytical performance with operational simplicity to support timely outbreak response and clinical decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
4
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
12
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
30
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%