RNase HII-assisted amplification (RHAM) for rapid point-of-care monkeypox detection
Kamhieh-Milz, J.; Kamhieh-Milz, S.; Schwarz, F.; Michel, J.; Nitsche, A.; Puyskens, A.
Show abstract
Mpox poses an ongoing global public health threat, with case numbers rising beyond traditionally endemic regions in Central and Western Africa. Rapid detection of the causative agent, the Monkeypox virus (MPXV), is critical for outbreak control, yet laboratory infrastructure and trained personnel remain scarce in many affected areas. Point-of-care molecular diagnostics offer a practical solution by enabling timely testing without specialized equipment or elaborate nucleic acid extraction. We evaluated the performance of an extraction-free RNase HII-assisted amplification (RHAM) assay for MPXV detection by Pluslife Biotech, a novel isothermal amplification technology providing results in under 30 minutes. The Pluslife RHAM test demonstrated pan-MPXV clade reactivity, detecting all four MPXV clades (Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb) with high analytical sensitivity and no cross-reactivity to other poxviruses or other clinically relevant pathogens. The assay proved compatible with diverse clinical specimen types, including lesion swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, rectal swabs, urine, semen, and wound exudate. As part of routine diagnostics at the German Consultant Laboratory for Poxviruses, in a comprehensive evaluation of 206 clinical specimens against diagnostic real-time PCR, the Pluslife RHAM test achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 94.2% (95% CI: 85.8-98.4%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 97.3-100%). Notably, samples with higher viral loads (Ct <30) showed 100% sensitivity. Time-to-result correlated significantly with viral load, enabling faster diagnosis in high-viral-load cases. The Pluslife RHAM test represents a practical, sensitive, and rapid point-of-care solution for MPXV detection in resource-limited settings, combining strong analytical performance with operational simplicity to support timely outbreak response and clinical decision-making.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of Mpox and other Orthopoxviruses using a Lateral Flow Device as a Point of Care diagnostic. 96%
- Real-time RT-PCR Allelic Discrimination Assay for Detection of N501Y Mutation in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Variants of Concern 95%
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of the Accula SARS-CoV-2 Test with a Laboratory-Developed Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Clinical Nasopharyngeal Specimens 96%
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 96%
- Clinical Performance and Trends During the First Two Months of Monkeypox Virus PCR Testing at Two United States Reference Labs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid adaptation of established high-throughput molecular testing infrastructure for detection of monkeypoxvirus 97%
- Diagnostic accuracy of three mpox lateral flow assays for antigen detection in the Democratic Republic of Congo and the United Kingdom 96%
- Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern identifying a cluster of B.1.1.28/P.1 variant in British Columbia, Canada 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation and clinical validation of pan-specific and clade-specific diagnostic real-time PCR assays for human mpox virus 96%
- Laboratory Validation and Clinical Implementation of Human Monkeypox Saliva-Based Tests 95%
- Wide mismatches in the sequences of primers and probes for Monkeypox virus diagnostic assays 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.