Routine Data for Workforce Equality Monitoring: Ethnic Inequalities in Recruitment and Workforce Representation in Nursing and Midwifery
Boldbaatar, A.; Strahle, S.; Shamsuddin, A.; Henderson, D.
Show abstract
Aim To examine ethnic inequalities in recruitment outcomes and workforce representation across pay bands among nursing and midwifery staff, and to assess whether routinely collected administrative data can generate reproducible indicators for workforce equality monitoring. Design Retrospective observational study. Methods We analyzed routinely collected administrative data from one NHS Board in Scotland. This included annual staff-in-post data for 2021/22 to 2024/25 and pooled recruitment data on interviewed candidates and conditional job offers for 2021/22 to 2023/24. Ethnicity was grouped as White and non-White. Analyses focused on Bands 5, 6 and 7. Recruitment outcomes were assessed using relative risks for receipt of a conditional job offer among interviewed candidates, comparing White and non-White applicants. Workforce representation across pay bands was assessed using representation quotients. Analyses were descriptive and unadjusted. Results White applicants were more likely than non-White applicants to receive a conditional job offer following interview across all pay bands examined. Inequalities were also evident at Band 5, the usual entry point to registered practice. Workforce composition analyses showed a corresponding gradient in representation, with non-White staff overrepresented in Band 5 and underrepresented in Bands 6 and 7, with little change over the study period. Conclusion Routinely collected administrative data can generate reproducible indicators of ethnic inequality in recruitment and workforce representation. Embedded within existing workforce systems, such analyses could strengthen workforce equality monitoring, support benchmarking and enhance accountability across healthcare settings. Impact Utilising routine administrative data for workforce equality monitoring can support policy and practice aimed at improving accountability, retention and workforce sustainability across health systems. Reporting Method This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines. Patient or Public Involvement This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the relationship between women’s experience of postnatal care and reported staffing measures: an observational study 93%
- Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 93%
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 94%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 94%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 88%
- Uptake of infant and pre-school immunisations in Scotland and England during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study of routinely collected data 88%
- Mitigating the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions: The B ehavioural A ctivation in S ocial I so l ation (BASIL) pilot randomised controlled trial to prevent depression and loneliness among older people with long term conditions 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 90%
- Comparing human vs. machine-assisted analysis to develop a new approach for Big Qualitative Data Analysis 89%
- Socioeconomic and demographic patterning of family uptake of a paediatric electronic patient portal innovation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners’ views in 2018 and 2023 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 91%
- Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.