Back

Autologous skin cell suspensions established by the VeritaCell method accelerate healing and suppress scarring-associated cutaneous thickening in a rat wound model in vivo

Peake, M.; Volrats, O.; Pilipenko, V.; Upite, J.; Sergeyev, A.; Jansone, B.; Georgopoulos, N. T.

2026-03-31 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.30.715294 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Autologous cell suspension (ACS)-based therapies are an established strategy to enhance wound repair, yet limitations in preparation workflows and donor skin requirements remain barriers to wider clinical implementation. We have previously developed VeritaCell, a rapid enzymatic disaggregation-based approach that generates highly viable skin cell populations, including epidermal stem cell-enriched fractions, and demonstrated their pro-regenerative biological properties in vitro. Here, we have evaluated the in vivo efficacy of VeritaCell-derived ACS using a rat full-thickness excisional wound model. ACS preparations were applied at donor-to-wound area ratios of 1:1, 1:10, and 1:20, and wound progression was monitored through longitudinal image-based quantification alongside histological assessment of tissue architecture. ACS-treated wounds exhibited enhanced early wound closure dynamics, with significant within-group improvements evident by Day 6. Histological analysis demonstrated improved neo-epithelial organisation and reduced epidermal thickening in the 1:10 and 1:20 groups, with the 1:10 condition showing tissue architecture most closely resembling unwounded skin. Notably, beneficial effects were observed even at low estimated cell numbers, suggesting that cell viability and biological activity may be key determinants of therapeutic efficacy. Collectively, these findings provide in vivo validation of VeritaCell-derived ACS and support the use of biologically informed donor-to-wound coverage ratios. This approach may enable effective wound repair while minimising donor skin requirements, with potential relevance for the treatment of extensive injuries such as burns.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.4%
2
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
5
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
9
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
10
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.2%
14
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
15
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
17
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
24
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
27
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%