Back

To self or to clone? Southern European woodland strawberry genotypes self-fertilize, whereas eastern European genotypes clone in a pollinator-free common garden.

Diller, C.; De-la-Cruz, I. M.; Egan, P. A.; Hytönen, T.; Stenberg, J. A.

2026-04-01 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.30.715235 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Premise of studyUnder increasingly frequent pollinator-limited environments, plants need to rely on modes of reproductive assurance such as selfing and cloning. However, few studies investigate the interplay between selfing and cloning in plants that can do both. Here, we explore mechanisms determining the relative expression of selfing and cloning throughout the European distribution of the wild woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) under a pollinator-free environment. MethodsWe established an outdoor common garden with 121 woodland strawberry genotypes from across Europe and excluded them from pollinators. For each genotype, we recorded reproductive traits and performed hand-pollination treatments. Key ResultsWe found a weak trade-off between cloning and selfing, driven by increased seed and fruit provisioning rather than flower production. The capacity to autonomously self-fertilize was determined by the lateral proximity of the anthers to the pistils (lateral herkogamy), but not by early inbreeding depression. Genotypes sampled at lower latitudes and altitudes were better at self-fertilizing and had smaller petals. The propensity to clone increased towards the east, where genotypes also had smaller petals, particularly at higher latitudes. ConclusionAt the species level, we detected a trade-off between the propensity for clonal reproduction and the capacity for self-fertilization. At a continental scale, the capacity to self-fertilize varied along a north-south gradient, whereas clonal propensity varied along an east-west gradient. Our results suggest that these two modes of reproductive assurance may compensate for reduced pollinator attractiveness (smaller petals) in regions where each mode is most strongly expressed.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.4%
2
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.2%
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
23
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
25
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%