Back

SELECT 2.0: Refined and open access SELection Endpoints in Communities of bacTeria (SELECT) method to determine concentrations of antibiotics that may select for antimicrobial resistance in the environment

Hayes, A.; Kay, S.; Lowe, C.; Gaze, W. H.; Recker, M.; Buckling, A.; Murray, A. K.

2026-03-30 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.30.713945 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant and growing threat to human, plant and animal health, the global economy, and food security. The One Health approach to AMR recognises the role of the environment in the evolution, emergence, and dissemination of AMR. In part, this is due to anthropogenic pollution that releases AMR organisms alongside cocktails of compounds that may select for AMR in situ, which then pose an exposure risk to humans and animals. This has spurred growing interest from cross-sectoral stakeholders in environmental risk assessment (ERA) of antibiotics, with regards to their selective potential. Many different experimental and modelling approaches have been used to determine the lowest concentration of an antibiotic that may select for AMR. Debates continue regarding which individual approach, if any, may be best for determining concentrations of antibiotics that may select for AMR, for ERA purposes. This paper contributes to this ongoing discourse by refining and using a previously published method SELECT (SELection Endpoints in Communities of bacTeria) to rapidly generate predicted no effect concentrations for resistance (PNECRs) for 32 antibiotics on the premise that reduction in growth of complex community of bacteria correlates with selection for AMR resistance genes. The database of PNECRs of antibiotics presented here is the largest generated using a single experimental, empirical approach that will aid future efforts towards creating a standardised test. PNECR data were used to conduct ERAs using measured environmental concentrations of antibiotics to rank antibiotics by potential selection risk in different environments. The experimental approach and statistical code have been made open access, with online tutorials available to facilitate other laboratories using the SELECT 2.0 method. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this approach and how these could be addressed in future studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.5%
2
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
6
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
16
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
30
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%