Impact of Primary Graft Dysfunction on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients
Monserrate-Marrero, J.; Castro-Medina, M.; Feingold, B.; Giraldo-Grueso, M.; Rose-Felker, K.; Tang, R.; Kobayashi, K.; Diaz-Castrillon, C. E.; McIntyre, K.; Da Silva, L.; Da Silva, J. P.; Morell, V.; Seese, L.
Show abstract
Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains one of the leading causes of early mortality after pediatric heart transplant (HT). While neurodevelopmental impacts of congenital heart disease (CHD) are well-characterized, the effect of PGD on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in pediatric HT recipients remains unknown. We sought to determine the association between PGD and neurodevelopmental outcomes in this population. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. All pediatric (age <18 years) isolated heart transplant recipients from 2010-2025 were included. The most recent pre- and post-transplant neurodevelopmental outcomes including cognitive delay, motor development, academic progress, and function status (stratified by age) were compared between PGD (n=434) and non- PGD groups (n=6956). Results: PGD patients had significantly worse pre-transplant functional status and motor development. Post-transplant, PGD was associated with worse motor development (18.8% vs. 13.0% definite motor delay; p=0.01) and functional status in younger children (39.5% vs. 57.8% able to keep up with peers; p<0.001). Post-transplant stroke occurred 3.5 times more frequently in PGD patients (11.5% vs. 3.3%; p<0.001). Cognitive development (p=0.94) and academic progress (p=0.096) did not differ significantly. Thirty-day (7.8% vs. 1.9%) and 1-year mortality (20.3% vs. 6.4%) were significantly higher in PGD patients (both p<0.001). Conclusions: This is the first study to characterize neurodevelopmental outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing HT with PGD. PGD is associated with significantly worse motor development and functional status independent of pre-transplant baseline. There is a 3.5-fold higher stroke rate providing a plausible neurological mechanism. The findings support targeted developmental surveillance recommendations and early intervention for this high-risk population.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefit and Risk of Endomyocardial Biopsy for Heart Transplant Patients in the Contemporary Era 93%
- How hostile is prolonged brain death for donor organs in transplantation? A time course analysis using clinical samples 92%
- A Combined HLA Molecular Mismatch and Expression Analysis for Evaluating HLA-DPB1 de novo Donor-Specific Antibody Risk in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplantation: Implications for Solid Organ & Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support utilization, Left Ventricular Assist Device implantation and Transplant during Cardiogenic Shock Hospitalizations, after the New Heart Allocation Policy 91%
- Early left ventricular systolic function is a more sensitive predictor of adverse events after heart transplant 91%
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of de novo Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation 92%
- Balancing Equity and HLA Matching in Deceased-Donor Kidney Allocation with Eplet Mismatch 92%
- Direct and indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the survival of kidney transplant recipients: a national observational study in France 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kidney Function Assessment Using Cystatin C and Serum Creatinine in Heart Transplantation Recipients: Implications for Valganciclovir Dosing 91%
- Relationship Between Donor Derived Cell-Free DNA and Tissue-Based Rejection-Related Transcripts In Heart Transplantation 91%
- CT-based Machine Learning for Donor Lung Screening Prior to Transplantation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.