The impact of the two-child benefit cap on parental mental, general, and financial health in the UK
Paulino, A.; Dykxhoorn, J.; Evans-Lacko, S.; Patalay, P.
Show abstract
Background: The two-child benefit cap, implemented in April 2017, restricted Universal Credit and Child Tax Credit to the first two children in households with three or more children. We evaluate the impact of the two-child benefit cap on parental mental, general, and financial health, as well as investigate how this may differ in particular sociodemographic and economic subgroups based on sex, ethnicity and income. Methods: Data was obtained from parents (youngest child aged 5 or under) in the UK Household Longitudinal Survey from 2009 to 2023. Outcomes included parental mental health (psychological distress and life satisfaction), general health (health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-rated health and health satisfaction), and financial health (current financial situation and financial outlook). We used complementary policy evaluation methods with different strengths and assumptions to triangulate evidence and strengthen inference: interrupted time series (ITS), difference-in-differences (DiD) and controlled time series analysis (CITS). Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, ethnicity, and income. Findings: Across methods, findings consistently indicate that the policy worsened life satisfaction, self-rated health, health satisfaction, and financial health for parents of 3+ children. Findings were less consistent across methods for psychological distress and HRQoL. For instance, for psychological distress ITS and CITS indicate adverse impacts of the policy; however, one DiD model did not support this conclusion due to greater average worsening in the control group between the pre- and post-periods. Subgroup analyses indicate greater mental health and general health impacts in lower income, male and ethnic minority parents; while financial health was negatively impacted in all subgroups examined. Conclusions: Using repeated cross-sectional panel data and triangulating across causal inference methods, we conclude that the two-child benefit cap in the UK had a measurable adverse impact on most health outcomes examined, with worse outcomes for male, lower income and ethnic minority parents.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Causal Effects of Health Conditions and Risk Factors on Social and Socioeconomic Outcomes: Mendelian Randomization in UK Biobank 94%
- Association between household composition and severe COVID-19 outcomes in older people by ethnicity: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform 93%
- Reweighting the UK Biobank to reflect its underlying sampling population substantially reduces pervasive selection bias due to volunteering 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long COVID and financial outcomes: Evidence from four longitudinal population surveys 94%
- Trends in psychological distress in Great Britain, 1991-2019: evidence from three representative surveys 93%
- The impact of parental adverse childhood experiences on children's healthcare utilisation: a systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Information nudges for influenza vaccination: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial 93%
- Socioeconomic inequalities in prevalence and development of multimorbidity across adulthood: findings from the MRC 1946 National Survey of Health & Development 91%
- CoMix: Changes in social contacts as measured by the contact survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in England between March 2020 and March 2021 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime 93%
- Parental Income Gradients in Adult Health: A National Cohort Study 93%
- The UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and changes in diet, physical activity and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from eight longitudinal studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parental preferences for a mandatory vaccination scheme in England; a discrete choice experiment 92%
- Predictors of uncertainty and unwillingness to receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine: an observational study of 22,139 fully vaccinated adults in the UK 92%
- Changing probability of experiencing food insecurity by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.