Maternal APOL1 Genotypes and Preeclampsia Risk
Tong, W.; Conti-Ramsden, F.; Beckwith, H.; Syngelaki, A.; Mitrogiannis, I.; Chappell, L.; Hysi, P.; Williamson, C.; Limou, S.; Nicolaides, K.; Bramham, K.; de Marvao, A.
Show abstract
Background: APOL1 risk alleles are prevalent in individuals of West African ancestry and associated with increased risk of kidney disease. Although preeclampsia disproportionately affects women of Black ethnic backgrounds, evidence linking APOL1 alleles to preeclampsia remains conflicting. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore whether maternal APOL1 alleles contribute to preeclampsia risk and associated adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study design: We conducted a nested case-control study of 5210 pregnant women, including 745 preeclampsia cases and 949 controls of Black self-reported ethnicity, 1385 preeclampsia cases and 2131 controls of White self-reported ethnicity. APOL1 G1 and G2 risk alleles were directly genotyped on the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array. Associations with preeclampsia, early preeclampsia, recurrent preeclampsia, birthweight centiles and gestational age at delivery were examined using regression models assuming a recessive mode of inheritance with adjustment for established risk factors and stratification by self-reported ethnicity and genetically-determined ancestry. Results: Presence of APOL1 risk alleles was almost exclusively observed in women of Black self-reported ethnicity. 168/949 controls (17.7%) and 133/745 cases (17.9%) carried two APOL1 risk alleles, and these women did not have a significantly increased risk of preeclampsia compared to those with zero or one APOL1 risk alleles in adjusted analyses (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.76-1.29, p=0.972). When restricting analysis to women of Black self-reported ethnicity only, no association was observed between APOL1 genotype and preeclampsia risk (adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61-1.25, p=0.673). When restricting analysis to women of pan-African genetically-determined ancestry only, also no association was observed between APOL1 genotype and preeclampsia risk (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.76-1.32). No associations were found between number of APOL1 risk alleles and early preeclampsia, recurrent preeclampsia, birthweight centile or gestational age at delivery after adjustment for established risk factors and stratification by self-reported ethnicity or genetically-determined ancestry. Conclusions: Maternal APOL1 risk alleles do not independently influence preeclampsia risk or related adverse outcomes in a multi-ethnic pregnancy study. Future studies should examine whether fetal APOL1 genotypes, alone or in interaction with maternal genotypes, contribute to preeclampsia risk.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fetal Growth Disorders Detection During First Trimester Gestation Through Comprehensive Maternal Circulating DNA Profiling 93%
- Fetal alleles predisposing to metabolically favourable adiposity are associated with higher birth weight 93%
- Common genetic variants with fetal effects on birth weight are enriched for proximity to genes implicated in rare developmental disorders 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unique transcriptomic landscapes identified in idiopathic spontaneous and infection related preterm births compared to normal term births 93%
- Changes in pregnancy-related serum biomarkers early in gestation are associated with later development of preeclampsia 93%
- Both general- and central- obesity are causally associated with polycystic ovarian syndrome: Findings of a Mendelian randomization study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy on perinatal health: A wide-angled Mendelian randomization study 92%
- Association of heavy menstrual bleeding with cardiovascular diseases in US female hospitalizations 92%
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.