Back

Development and validation of a Modular Footwear Setup for testing the isolated biomechanical effects of footwear features

Sarlak, H.; Shakir, K.; Rogati, G.; Sartorato, G.; Leardini, A.; Berti, L.; Caravaggi, P.

2026-03-31 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.03.30.26349729 medRxiv
Show abstract

The effects of specific footwear features on biomechanical parameters are often confounded by simultaneous changes in other shoe conditions, making it difficult to identify the isolated effect of material and design properties on relevant biomechanical outcomes. This study aimed to propose a tool, namely the Modular Footwear Setup (MFS), to assess the effects of midsole modifications on lower limb joint kinematics and in-shoe plantar pressure. The MFS uses a micro-hook-and-loop fastening system and a custom alignment device to enable fast, strong, and reliable midsole attachment/detachment to/from the upper. Accuracy and repeatability of the MFS in replicating the biomechanical outcomes of a control shoe featuring the same upper and midsole were tested in 10 healthy participants (5M,5F; age=33.2{+/-}9.2 yrs; BMI=21.5{+/-}2.8 kg/m2). Participants were asked to walk wearing both the MFS and the standard control shoe in three sessions. Kinematics of lower limb joints were measured via inertial measurement units, while capacitive pressure insoles were used to measure in-shoe plantar pressure. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the repeatability of kinematic and pressure measurements between sessions. Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis did not identify significant differences in joint kinematics between conditions. While the MFS exhibited slightly lower peak pressure at the rearfoot, pressure parameters were not statistically different in the other foot regions. The MFS demonstrated good-to-excellent inter-session repeatability (ICC 0.84-0.97) for peak and mean pressure. Participants reported similar levels of comfort and stability in both shoes. The findings of the present study suggest the MFS has the potential to be a reliable and accurate tool for evaluating the effect of midsole features on relevant biomechanical parameters. This modular approach may improve data-driven footwear design by providing a consistent platform for testing the effects of midsole designs and materials across various applications, including therapeutic, safety, and athletic shoes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
4
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
10
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
11
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
14
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
16
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%