Back

Surgical complications during pregnancy following bariatric surgery: a Belgian nationwide population-based study

De Mulder, P.; Benoit, K.; Daelemans, C.; Debieve, F.; Devlieger, R.; Roelens, K.; Van Nieuwenhove, Y.; Vandenberghe, G.

2026-03-31 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.03.30.26349694 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of surgical complications during pregnancy in women with a history of bariatric surgery. Design: A nationwide, prospective, population-based cohort study. Setting: High-risk obstetric care in Belgium: 67.6% of maternity units participated, covering 65% of all births in the study period. Participants: Pregnant women with a history of bariatric surgery presenting with a surgical complication (internal hernia, intussusception, volvulus or adhesions; anastomotic ulcer or abscess; gastric band slippage; or incisional hernia) between January 2021 and December 2022. Results: Thirty-three women experienced 35 surgical complications. Internal herniation was most common (n=25), predominantly following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Mean gestational age at diagnosis was 27+6 weeks. All women underwent surgical exploration within 24 hours; bowel resection was required in two cases. Caesarean section occurred in 48.5%, with 13 preterm births and one neonatal death. One woman required intensive care. No maternal death occurred. Conclusion: Surgical complications following bariatric surgery in pregnancy are uncommon but carry significant obstetric risks. All observed complications occurred after procedures involving intestinal rerouting, predominantly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Prompt surgical management was associated with low maternal morbidity and no mortality, but frequently resulted in preterm birth and emergency caesarean section. These findings highlight the need for a low threshold for surgical evaluation of abdominal pain in pregnant women with previous bariatric surgery and suggest that procedure type is relevant when counselling women of reproductive age.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
36.3%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
5
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
7
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
10
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
15
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%