Back

Left Ventricular Geometry Improves Prediction of Sex-Specific Post-TAVR Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis

Goraya, S. A.; Lauwers, P.; Javadikasgari, H.; Rouhollahi, A.; Homaei, A.; Masoumi, S.; Zancanaro, E.; Rezaeitaleshmahalleh, S.; Ayers, B. C.; Hirji, S.; Alkhouli, M.; Jassar, A. S.; Aganj, I.; Sabe, A.; Nezami, F. R.

2026-03-31 surgery
10.64898/2026.03.30.26349680 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Women with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are diagnosed later and experience poorer outcomes than men, partly because clinical approaches rely on 2D, valve-centric thresholds derived from male-predominant cohorts that underutilize information from 3D left ventricular (LV) geometry. We hypothesize that a sex-specific computational framework integrating statistical shape analysis (SSA) of pre-TAVR CT with machine learning would improve prediction of 1-year LV mass regression (LVMR). Objective: To develop a computational framework leveraging 3D LV geometry and evaluate whether it improves sex-specific prediction of 1-year LVMR after TAVR. Methods: We studied 339 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR from 2013 to 2020 and had pre-TAVR CT and 1-year post-TAVR echocardiography. LV geometries were segmented into digital twins, and shape modes predictive of LVMR were extracted using SSA and partial least squares. These modes were incorporated into support vector regression models and compared with conventional echocardiographic predictors, including pre-TAVR LVEF, LVMI, and E/A ratio. Performance was assessed using RMSE and R^2. Results: After one year, 65% of patients showed positive LVMR, with median regression of approximately 10%; regression was significant overall and within each sex (p<0.001) and similar between sexes (p=0.99). Predictive shape modes differed by sex (p<0.01), with women showing more localized variation and men broader geometric gradients. Sex-specific shape modes outperformed general modes and clinical metrics, particularly in women (R^2=0.80, RMSE=0.09 vs. R^2=0.59, RMSE=0.13; clinical-only baseline R^2=0.16, RMSE=0.22). In men, sex-specific modes also performed strongly (R^2=0.89, RMSE=0.08). Conclusion: In severe AS, 3D LV geometry predicts post-TAVR reverse remodeling more accurately than conventional metrics and may improve risk stratification, particularly in women.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
12
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
19
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
29
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%