Back

The Power of Partnership: Democratizing Genetic Prevalence to Empower Patient Advocacy

Baxter, S. M.; Singer-Berk, M.; Glaze, C.; Russell, K.; Grant, R. H.; Groopman, E.; Lee, J.; Watts, N.; Wood, J. C.; Wilson, M.; Rare As One Network, ; Rehm, H. L.; O'Donnell-Luria, A.

2026-03-31 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.30.26349539 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Accurate estimation of disease prevalence is crucial for public health and therapeutic development, but traditional methods are often inaccurate. Genetic prevalence, which estimates the proportion of a population with a causal genotype, using allele frequencies from population data, offers an important alternative. Methods: We partnered with 18 Rare As One patient organizations to estimate genetic prevalence for 22 autosomal recessive conditions using population data from two releases of the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). To standardize and democratize these analyses, we developed the Genetic Prevalence Estimator (GeniE), a publicly available tool, for accessible calculations. Results: Conservative carrier frequencies in gnomAD v4.1 ranged from 1/164 to 1/11,888. The median change in genetic prevalence frequency between v2.1 to v4.1 was 0.806. Partnership with patient advocacy groups provided critical real-world context that refined the interpretation of these estimates. Discussion: These findings highlight that genetic prevalence is not a static figure but a dynamic, evolving measure with important caveats that need to be considered. Our study underscores the necessity of re-evaluations as databases expand. By integrating patient-partnered insights with the GeniE platform, we empower the genomics community to maintain transparent, up-to-date, and actionable data for rare disease advocacy and drug development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.7%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.5%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.5%
4
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
6
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
9
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
11
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
13
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
17
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
19
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
20
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
21
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%