Back

A mixed-methods realist evaluation of the Sutton Parenting Offer (universal parenting programme): A study protocol

Varela-Mato, V.; Ngina, D.; Orton, E.; Barnes, J.

2026-03-31 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.30.26348215 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Parenting practices shape children's emotional, social, and cognitive developmental wellbeing. Yet, many families face complex challenges that increase the risk of poor outcomes and demand on social care. The Sutton Parenting Offer (SPO) is a universal, peer-led parenting offer that provides early, non-stigmatising support to families with children aged 0-25 years. It combines evidence-based programmes with informal workshops and peer networks delivered through Family Hubs. This present study is an evaluation protocol of the parenting offer. Aim This evaluation aims to explore how, why, and in what contexts SPO supports families in engaging, sustaining positive change, and generating wider system value. Methods A mixed-methods realist evaluation approach will be used to evaluate SPO across four work packages: engagement pathways, early changes and peer-led ecosystems, long-term change, and system value for money. Data sources will include attendance data (anonymised service records), survey data (entry and exit), and qualitative data (dyad interviews, story circles, and stakeholder-value mapping workshops). The COM-B and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) will guide the analysis of behavioural data. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively and using paired parametric and non-parametric tests, while qualitative data will be analysed thematically following a realist-informed approach to refine context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. Discussion This protocol presents the first realist informed evaluation of a universal parenting program in a local authority setting. The evaluation will generate evidence on how, when and why a universal, community-based, and peer-led model such as the Sutton Parenting Offer engages families and generates change. The findings will be useful to inform future parenting service design and implementation in local contexts in England.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.2%
3
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
9
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%