Back

How farming practices and livestock management affect Human-Wildlife Conflict intensity in Southern Ecuador: The case of the Spectacled Bear (Tremarctos ornatus) and feral dogs

Lopes, F.; Penaherrera-Aguirre, M.; Cisneros, R.

2026-03-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.29.715147 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHuman-Wildlife Conflict is emerging as one of the most critical conservation and socio-economic challenges in the Ecuadorian Andes, where both rural livelihoods and native fauna are under increasing pressure. Small-scale livestock producers in the region depend almost entirely on a limited number of cattle, meaning that the loss of even a single animal can lead to severe economic hardship. In response, antagonistic actions against wildlife are frequent, further threatening vulnerable species. At the same time, the recent proliferation of feral dogs adds a new dimension to conflict, posing risks to both livestock and native fauna. Despite the growing severity of this conflict, little is known of its drivers, spatial patterns, and socio-ecological consequences. This study seeks to fill that gap by generating insights to inform targeted conservation strategies for community-based mitigation of conflict with spectacled bears and feral dogs. MethodsTo assess the drivers and dynamics of HWC in southern Ecuador, we conducted structured interviews with livestock owners, quantifying the frequency and intensity of conflicts across multiple species and evaluating whether farm composition and management practices predict conflict patterns. ResultsOur results reveal that large carnivores cause significantly higher economic losses than smaller predators; furthermore, feral dogs have emerged as the primary source of financial damage over the past five years. Farms with a greater proportion of forest edge were associated with a higher probability of severe conflict, particularly with large carnivores. ConclusionsThese findings underscore the urgent need for proactive strategies to promote coexistence. Identifying predictive variables of conflict risk is crucial for vulnerability assessments and the design of effective mitigation policies. Controlling feral dog populations is likely to be a critical step in safeguarding both rural human livelihoods and native biodiversity in the Andean landscape.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
25.9%
2
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
4
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
10
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.7%
25
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
28
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%