Association of Suzetrigine With Postoperative Outcomes Versus Opioid Analgesics: Propensity-Matched Study

Background: Perioperative pain management modality potentially influences psychiatric morbidity and healthcare utilization. The opioids have been most commonly used for managing postoperative pain and carry a high degree of risk for creating mood disorders, anxiety, sleep disturbances, and healthcare burdens. A novel non-opioid analgesic, Suzetrigine, may be able to effectively manage postoperative pain without some of the psychological and economic risks that come from the use of opioids. In this study, we measured psychiatric outcomes and emergency department (ED) usage among postoperative patients who received either suzetrigine or opioids. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, encompassing 64 healthcare organizations. Adult patients (> Age 18 years) who underwent surgery and received suzetrigine were compared with patients who underwent surgery and received opioids. Propensity score matching (1:1) performed to match cohorts based on demographic factors (age, gender, racial/ethnic status), social determinants of health (ICD-10 Z55-Z65), family histories of substance abuse and psychiatric disorders (Z81.x), surrogate measures of prior healthcare utilization, and pre-existing clinical severity using Elixhauser-Charlson comorbidity proxies (hypertensive diseases [I10-I15], diabetes mellitus [E08-E13], ischemic heart disease [I22-I25], and chronic pulmonary disease [J42-J47]). Matching also included behavioral risk factors (tobacco use and physical inactivity) and body mass index (BMI). Following matching, there were 2,221 patients in each cohort. The primary outcome assessed within one year after surgery was ED utilization, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and sleep disorders. Risk estimates and survival analyses were used to compare the outcomes. Results: In propensity-matched analyses, suzetrigine use was associated with a reduction in multiple psychiatric outcomes and healthcare utilization compared to opioid analgesics. There was less ED utilization in the suzetrigine cohort (5.9% v 13.1%, RR 0.45, p< .001). The psychiatric outcomes were also lower in the suzetrigine cohort than the opioid cohort, including depression (3.1% v 4.7%, RR 0.65, p= .005), anxiety (4.7% v 7.2%, RR 0.65, p< .001), PTSD (0.5% v 1.4%, RR 0.36, p= .002), and sleep disorders (4.2% v 6.0%, RR 0.71, p= .008). The survival analysis suggested an earlier onset of psychiatric diagnosis among the opioid recipients. Conclusion: In a matched real-world cohort of surgical patients, suzetrigine use was associated with lower short-term rates of selected postoperative outcomes compared with opioid analgesics. Keywords: Suzetrigine; Opioid-Sparing; Analgesia; Postoperative Outcomes; Cohort Study