Back

cliexa-RA Implementation in Colorado Arthritis Center: A Case Study of Quadruple Aim Impacts

Kazgan, M.

2026-04-01 rheumatology
10.64898/2026.03.29.26349644 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Digital health platforms can improve clinical efficiency and patient outcomes, but adoption in routine care remains limited due to workflow and integration challenges. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management relies on consistent capture of patient-reported and clinical data, which is often time-intensive and inconsistently documented. Objective: To assess the impact of the cliexa-RA digital platform on patient experience, physician workflow, and cost-related outcomes using the Quadruple Aim framework. Methods: A six-month pilot study was conducted at the Colorado Arthritis Center involving 300 RA patients. Patients completed a 16-question intake (RAPID3-based), followed by clinician-entered joint assessments. The platform generated five disease activity scores (DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, CDAI, RAPID3) and produced EMR-compatible outputs. Time metrics, patient satisfaction, and workflow efficiency were evaluated. Results: Mean patient intake time was 2.4 minutes, a 52% reduction compared to paper-based processes. Clinician time for calculation and documentation decreased by 77%, with near real-time EMR integration. Overall patient satisfaction was high (3.55/4), with 85% recommending the platform. Physicians reported improved documentation efficiency and workflow integration. Administrative cost reductions were observed through decreased reporting burden and improved compliance with quality reporting requirements. Conclusions: The cliexa-RA platform significantly improved efficiency and user experience in RA management. These findings support the role of integrated digital tools in reducing administrative burden and enabling scalable, data-driven care, with potential downstream benefits for cost and population health.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.4%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
12
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
26
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%