Back

Evaluation of a multiplexed tiling PCR scheme for whole-genome amplification of hepatitis B virus using Oxford Nanopore sequencing

Brate, J.; Grande, E. G.; Pedersen, B. N.; Frengen, T. G.; Stene-Johansen, K.

2026-03-31 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.28.714721 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Here we evaluated the performance of a previously published tiling PCR primer scheme by Ringlander et al. (2022) for whole-genome amplification of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) in combination with Oxford Nanopore sequencing. The primer set originally developed for Ion Torrent sequencing was adapted by removing platform-specific adapters and tested using clinical serum or plasma samples submitted for routine HBV genotyping and resistance testing. Two multiplexing strategies were compared: a single PCR pool containing all primers and a two-pool strategy with non-overlapping amplicons. Sequencing reads were processed using a Nanopore analysis pipeline, and genome coverage and amplicon performance were compared across samples spanning a wide Ct range and representing HBV genotypes A-E. Across all samples, the median genome coverage was approximately 50%, although recovery varied widely, ranging from complete failure to nearly full genomes. Combining all primers into a single PCR reaction, or separating overlapping amplicons into different reactions, had little overall impact on genome recovery, and no consistent differences between the two pooling strategies were observed. In contrast, amplification efficiency differed markedly between individual amplicons. Amplicons 1-5 generally produced higher sequencing depth, whereas amplicons 6-10 frequently showed low coverage and contributed to incomplete genome recovery. Genome coverage was strongly associated with Ct values, with higher coverage observed in samples with lower Ct values, while coverage was broadly similar across genotypes. These results demonstrate that the Ringlander et al. primer scheme can be adapted for multiplex PCR and Nanopore sequencing of HBV, but uneven amplicon performance limits consistent full-genome recovery and highlights the need for further optimization of HBV tiling PCR designs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.1%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
5
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
22
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
29
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%