Back

Older adults beliefs about coping strategies for anxiety: A UK-based multicultural qualitative study informed by Leventhals Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation

Alkholy, R.; Bee, P.; Pedley, R.; Lovell, K.

2026-03-30 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.28.26349595 medRxiv
Show abstract

AIM Older adults experiencing anxiety disorders, particularly those from minority ethnic backgrounds, are less likely to use formal mental health services compared to their younger counterparts. This UK multicultural qualitative study aimed to explore and compare beliefs underpinning coping strategies for anxiety among self-reporting White British, South Asian, African and Caribbean older adults, using Leventhal's Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation. METHODS Individual semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 52 older adults aged 65 and over who self-reported (current or past) anxiety. Professional interpreters supported interviews with non-English-speaking participants (n=10). Eight public contributors collaborated on different aspects of the study. The Framework Method was used to manage and analyse the data. FINDINGS The study drew on the perspectives of 27 older adults with distressing anxiety and 25 with non-distressing anxiety. Across all cultural groups, participants adopted different strategies to manage anxiety, the most prominent of which were self-help strategies. Help-seeking behaviour was influenced by a complex interplay of factors not recognised by Leventhal's Common-Sense Model. Notably, older adults' salient identities, rather than their cultural backgrounds, influenced their selection of coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS Interventions that empower older adults to use self-help strategies more effectively can serve as acceptable adjuncts to formal therapy. Nevertheless, addressing barriers to formal help-seeking is essential, particularly among those with a perceived need to seek help. No one model can depict the complexity of coping behaviours. While applying Leventhal's Common-Sense Model yielded novel insights, it could not fully capture the motivational factors underlying participation in specific coping behaviours. To provide nuanced and accurate insights, cross-cultural research should acknowledge heterogeneity within groups rather than impose boundaries of purportedly homogeneous entities.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.1%
2
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.6%
4
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
20
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
30
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%