Back

3D Droplet-Based Bioprinting of Customized In Vitro Head and Neck Cancer Tumor Microenvironment Models

Messuri, V.; Ha, A.; Cruz, L. A.; Harrington, D.

2026-03-31 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.27.714925 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In vitro models are increasingly critical for interrogating cancer biology and therapeutic response, however, accurately recapitulating the tumor microenvironment (TME) remains a persistent challenge, particularly in head and neck cancers (HNC) characterized by complex cell-matrix interactions and heterogeneity. Current models often lack independent tunability of biochemical and biophysical cues, limiting systematic investigation of microenvironmental cues in a high-throughput format. Here, we establish a 3D droplet-based bioprinting platform for the fabrication of customizable in vitro TME models using poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels. Human HNC cell lines (FaDu and 2A3) with differing HPV statuses were bioprinted into PEG matrices spanning physiologically relevant stiffnesses (0.7-4.8 kPa) and compositions, including non-functionalized PEG and peptide-functionalized PEG (PEGfnc: RGD, YIGSR, CNYYSNS) and cultured for 7 days. Cluster growth, cell viability, and cluster morphology were assessed across multiple time points, matrix compositions, and matrix stiffnesses. Proliferation and endpoint phenotype expression were visualized using confocal microscopy through immunofluorescence. Results indicated enhanced cell viability in PEGfnc matrices, compared to non-functionalized matrices, while effect of matrix stiffness was less prominent. Median cluster size reached 40-50 m by day 7, and linear mixed-effects modeling identified how changes in cluster surface area, volume, and tumoroid complexity varied with cell type, matrix, and stiffness. By decoupling and systematically varying key TME parameters, this approach provides a robust and scalable framework for dissecting tumor-matrix interactions and advancing physiologically relevant in vitro models for cancer research and therapeutic screening.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
2
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
4
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
14
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%