Back

Leaf and cluster spectral signatures reveal trait-dependent prediction performance for grapevine cluster architecture and juice quality

Robles-Zazueta, C. A.; Strack, T.; Schmidt, M.; Callipo, P.; Robinson, H.; Vasudevan, A.; Voss-Fels, K.

2026-03-31 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.27.714894 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Grapevine cluster architecture is a key selection target in breeding programs because it influences disease susceptibility, yield stability and juice quality. High-throughput phenotyping offers a rapid and non-destructive approach to capture biochemical and structural variation in these traits, yet the influence of plant organ reflectance and data partitioning strategies on trait prediction remains poorly understood. In this study, we evaluated how hyperspectral reflectance from different grapevine organs contributes to the prediction of cluster architecture and juice quality traits in two clonal populations of Riesling and Pinot. Using partial least squares regression (PLSR), we assessed the prediction accuracy of eight cluster architecture and six juice quality traits under two data partitioning strategies. Models based on cluster reflectance outperformed those using dry leaf reflectance for most traits, except for pH. Partitioning the dataset by cluster type increased trait variance and improved predictions for number of berries (R{superscript 2} = 0.53), berry diameter (R{superscript 2} = 0.79), and total acidity (R{superscript 2} = 0.48). Visible, red-edge and NIR spectra were most informative regions to predict the traits studied. Together, our results highlight the importance of organ-specific data and appropriate calibration strategies to improve phenomic models for the development of scalable proxies for grapevine improvement. HighlightSpectral phenomics reveals that prediction accuracy in grapevine depends on organ spectral signatures and traits, with cluster reflectance outperforming leaves, informing new phenotyping strategies for breeding improvement.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.3%
2
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.0%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.7%
5
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
6
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
8
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
10
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
13
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
16
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%