Back

Study comparing characteristics of ademetionine-containing tablets from different countries

Mato, J. M.; Wong, G. L.; Gooijer, Y.; Safaei, A.

2026-03-30 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.03.27.714742 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background/ObjectivesThe quality and characteristics of approved medicines can vary substantially depending on manufacturing processes and standards within a given country. The aim of the study was to compare the available marketed brands of ademetionine tablets derived from various countries in order to identify potential differences between the different formulations. MethodsWe performed comprehensive analyses of the physical, chemical, and dissolution characteristics of different formulations of ademetionine tablets marketed in China, India, Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan, using the originator formulation of Heptral(R) as the reference standard. The formulations were evaluated at initial analysis and after 3 months at 40{degrees}C/75% relative humidity. Clinical parameters such as ademetionine content, degradation products, S,S-isomer, and water content were assessed using HPLC, and a dissolution profile analysis performed in 2 hours of acid solution followed by 90 minutes in a buffer solution. ResultsThe Nusam (India) and Ximeixin (China) products were the two products most comparable to the Heptral products. Adenomak (Ukraine), the only food-grade product and only one with the tosylate salt showed the most significant quality variations compared to Heptral including dissolution failure as well as considerable variability between batches. ConclusionsThe study highlights the importance of using pharmaceutical-grade ademetionine products to maintain clinical efficacy and ensuring standards are maintained across global markets.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.8%
2
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
4
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
8
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
9
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
12
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
19
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%