Back

Robustness and management performance of MSY reference points derived from the hockey-stick stock-recruitment model under structural uncertainty

Ichinokawa, M.; Okamura, H.

2026-03-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.27.714336 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The hockey-stick (HS) stock recruitment relationship (SRR) has been widely used as an empirical alternative to conventional SRRs such as the Beverton-Holt (BH) and Ricker (RI) models. However, the management performance and risks associated with estimating maximum-sustainable-yield (MSY) reference points (RPs) based on HS remain insufficiently understood. This study first defines deterministic and stochastic MSY RPs under the HS model and provides an overview of their properties. We then conduct simulation experiments to investigate the bias and management consequences that arise when MSY RPs are estimated from the HS model (HS-derived MSY RPs) rather than from the true SRR (e.g., BH) across a range of biological and stochastic parameters, with particular focus on scenarios with insufficient data contrast. Our results show that HS-derived MSY RPs tend to exhibit higher bias but lower variance than MSY RPs derived from the true SRR. Management strategy evaluation simulations further reveal that management procedures combining HS-derived MSY RPs with adaptive model learning and some precautionary measures gradually reduce this bias and achieve average spawning biomass and yield that are comparable to those obtained under management based on the true BH SRR. We also show that the management effectiveness of the precautionary measures depends on life-history traits and recruitment variability. These findings indicate that although HS-derived MSY RPs may be biased and require cautious use, combining them with appropriate precautionary measures allows management to remain robust while limiting variability and yield losses. This broadens the range of management options that are available for supporting sustainable fisheries management.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.8%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
6.1%
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
7
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.4%
9
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
14
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
27
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%