Back

Quantitative T2 Brain Mapping with Simultaneous RF Estimation Using Dual Interleaved Steady States at 7T MRI

Yacobi, D.; Schmidt, R.

2026-03-30 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.27.26349590 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective. Quantitative T2 mapping plays a critical role in brain imaging for assessing a range of neurological conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases, demyelinating disorders, and cerebrovascular pathologies. Despite its diagnostic potential, implementing quantitative T2 mapping at ultra-high magnetic field strengths ([≥]7T) poses significant challenges. These include elevated specific absorption rate (SAR) and radiofrequency (RF) field inhomogeneities, which can lead to prolonged scan durations and inaccuracies in quantification. Materials and Methods. Phase-based gradient-recalled echo (GRE) techniques have recently emerged as promising rapid acquisition with enhanced sensitivity to T2-related contrast. In this study, we introduce TWISTARE (TWo Interleaved Steady-states for T2 and RF Estimation), a novel dual steady-state 3D-GRE approach that employs interleaved flip angles and small RF phase increments to jointly estimate T2 and B1 maps. By combining two dual-steady-state scans, TWISTARE enables fast, whole-brain quantitative T2 mapping while reducing scan time and mitigating B1-related bias at ultra-high field. Results. Validation experiments included Bloch simulations, phantom studies and in-vivo imaging. The results demonstrated high precision in phantom experiments, achieving up to a two-fold reduction in acquisition time and achieved precision comparable to the gold-standard method in vivo within a similar scan duration. Discussion. TWISTARE establishes a fast steady-state framework for quantitative neuroimaging at ultrahigh field, offering potential benefits for both clinical and research applications, especially in longitudinal and dynamic studies of brain tissue.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.