Back

Availability and Quality of Anthropometric Data in Swiss Childrens Hospitals: The SwissPedGrowth Project

Leuenberger, L. M.; Shoman, Y.; Romero, F.; Deligianni, X.; Hartung, A.; Mozun, R.; Goebel, N.; Bielicki, J. A.; Burckhardt, M.-A.; Latzin, P.; Saner, C.; Posfay-Barbe, K. M.; Schwitzgebel, V.; Giannoni, E.; Hauschild, M.; Stocker, M.; Righini-Grunder, F.; Lauener, R.; Mueller, P.; Schlapbach, L. J.; Jenni, O. G.; Spycher, B. D.; Kuehni, C. E.; Belle, F. N.; for the SwissPedHealth Consortium,

2026-03-30 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.27.26349493 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anthropometric data are critical in paediatric care, routinely assessed during clinical visits, and available in electronic health records (EHRs). We describe the feasibility of extracting anthropometric data from heterogeneous EHR systems of Swiss childrens hospitals, evaluate their availability and quality, and assess the cohorts representativeness of the general population. METHODS: In this multicentre study (SwissPedGrowth), we retrospectively collected EHRs from patients <20 years who visited hospitals in Basel, Bern, Geneva, Lausanne, Luzern, St. Gallen, or Zurich between 2017-2023. Sociodemographic, administrative, and clinical information from EHRs were provided in a standardized way by a paediatric national data stream (SwissPedHealth), including the Swiss Neighbourhood Index of Socioeconomic Position (Swiss-SEP). We counted anthropometric recordings per visit to describe availability and used a self-developed and an existing (growthcleanr) algorithm to investigate data quality. To assess representativeness, we compared sociodemographic characteristics between SwissPedGrowth and the general paediatric population in Switzerland, computed standardized differences (effect size: 0.2 small, 0.5 medium, 0.8 large), and weighted the study population to reduce differences. RESULTS: We included 477,531 patients and 2,171,633 hospital visits; 54% boys, 71% Swiss, mean Swiss-SEP 65 (SD: 11), and median age at visit 6.3 [IQR: 2.3, 11.8] years. Height recordings were available for 20% of the visits, weights for 43%, and head circumferences for 5%, with better availability for inpatient stays than outpatient or emergency visits. Combining the self-developed and existing algorithm, 4% of heights and 3% of weights were flagged as outliers and 29% of heights and 31% of weights as carried forward from previous visits or same day duplicates. Sociodemographic differences between SwissPedGrowth and the general population were small or small-to-medium and disappeared after weighting. CONCLUSION: SwissPedGrowth demonstrates feasibility of extracting high-quality anthropometric data for paediatric growth research, but challenges regarding completeness and harmonization of EHR data across Swiss hospitals remain.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
4
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
13
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%