Back

Characterizing Oseltamivir Use among Community-Dwelling Patients Diagnosed with Influenza Virus Infection, 2023-2025

McNair, E. A.; Kwon, J. H.; Grijalva, C. G.; McLaren, S. H.; Biddle, J. E.; Dean, S.; White, E. B.; Fritz, S. A.; Presti, R. M.; O'Neil, C. A.; Sano, E.; Vargas, C.; Schmitz, J. E.; Zhu, Y.; Scott, T. A.; House, S.; Talbot, H. K.; Stockwell, M. S.; Mellis, A. M.

2026-03-30 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.03.27.26349417 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Oseltamivir is an antiviral medication for influenza that can reduce the duration of symptoms and may lower the risk of some complications. Recommendations for use of oseltamivir include in the outpatient setting for individuals at higher risk of developing influenza complications. Objectives: To describe oseltamivir initiation and treatment completion among influenza-positive outpatients and identify factors associated with each. Methods: In a U.S. outpatient household transmission study, index participants with laboratory-confirmed influenza provided up to 12 days of detailed information on medication use. We described oseltamivir initiation among index cases and treatment course completion of [&ge;] 10 doses among cases who initiated oseltamivir. We used unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression to identify factors associated with initiation and course completion. Results: Among 823 enrolled index cases, 324 (39%) initiated oseltamivir treatment. Of 406 persons at higher risk for influenza complications, 172 (42%) initiated treatment. Oseltamivir initiation was lowest among children aged 2 to < 5 years (19%) compared to all other age groups. Among 313 cases who initiated oseltamivir, 42% completed the recommended treatment course of [&ge;] 10 doses. Among 163 individuals at higher risk of influenza complications, 69 (42%) completed the recommended treatment course of [&ge;] 10 doses. Children < 2 years were significantly less likely to complete treatment compared to adults aged 18-50 years (aOR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.78, p= 0.030); reasons for discontinuation could not be determined. Conclusions: These findings reveal differences in oseltamivir treatment in an outpatient setting among groups at higher risk for influenza complications.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
8
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.3%
12
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
14
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%