Back

Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma in CDH1 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: Report from the GASTRIC Consortium

Gilad, O.; Drogan, C. M.; Keel, E.; Gao, G.; Swallow, C.; Govindarajan, A.; Brar, S.; Heller, M.; Apostolico, T.; Jacobs, M. F.; Gofar, K.; Dudley, B.; Karloski, E.; Lombardi, C.; Springer, M.; Saha, S.; Cox, D.; Lerner, B. A.; Hanna, G.; Chertock, Y.; Khan, A.; Ertan, S.; Hilfrank, K.; Rustgi, S. D.; Singh, A.; Hall, M. J.; Llor, X.; Bansal, A.; Patel, S. G.; Brand, R. E.; Roberts, M. E.; Stanich, P. P.; Stoffel, E.; Katona, B. W.; Aronson, M.; Kupfer, S. S.

2026-04-02 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.03.27.26349321 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Gastric cancer surveillance in CDH1 pathogenic variant carriers is challenging, as predictors of localized (stage T1a) and advanced (stage >T1a) signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) are not well defined. We established the Group of investigAtors STriving toward Research In CDH1 (GASTRIC) consortium to identify clinicopathological factors associated with localized and advanced SRCC. Methods: A retrospective observational study (1998-2025) of CDH1 carriers across twelve academic centers was performed. Clinical, endoscopic, and pathological data were compared between carriers with and without SRCC on endoscopy, and between those with advanced versus localized or no cancer on gastrectomy specimens. Results: Overall, 390 CDH1 carriers from 235 families were included. Presence of SRCCs on endoscopy was significantly associated with thickened folds, nodularity, masses, and intestinal metaplasia, while gastritis was negatively associated. Of 196 carriers (52.4%) undergoing gastrectomy, 11 (5.6%) had advanced cancers, 10(90.9%) of which showed endoscopic abnormalities. Identification of SRCC on baseline endoscopy was the most sensitive feature for advanced disease (0.81) but had moderate specificity (0.74), whereas masses and thickened folds were highly specific (0.99 and 0.96, respectively) but less sensitive. Negative predictive values were high (0.94-1.0), while positive predictive values were modest (0.13-0.66). On multivariate analysis, masses and SRCC foci on baseline endoscopy were independent predictors of advanced disease. Conclusion: Among CDH1 carriers, absence of endoscopic findings was reassuring, whereas significance of detected endoscopic and pathological abnormalities was less certain. Advanced cancer occurred in a small number of carriers, with endoscopic abnormalities in nearly all cases. Endoscopic surveillance might be an alternative to surgery in carriers without worrisome mucosal findings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
6
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
9
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%