Back

Enhancing Transcriptional Data Reliability in Fish Oogenesis Using cDNA-Based Normalization

Rojo-Bartolome, I.; Ibanez, J.; Cancio, I.; Ortiz-Zarragoitia, M.; Bilbao, E.

2026-03-29 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.03.26.714387 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcriptomic analyses are widely used to elucidate the molecular mechanisms driving gametogenesis and reproduction in fish, yet their accuracy depends heavily on appropriate normalization of gene expression data. Conventional approaches that rely on single or multiple reference genes are problematic during teleost oogenesis, as profound structural and physiological remodeling of the ovary challenges the assumption that commonly used reference transcripts remain stable. In this study, we assessed by qPCR the transcriptional variability of four widely used reference genes (actb, ef-1, gapdh, and 18S rRNA) throughout the oogenic cycle of the thicklip grey mullet (Chelon labrosus), using geNorm and NormFinder analyses, and we additionally evaluated total cDNA concentration as an alternative normalization factor. To examine the performance and interpretive consequences of each normalization strategy, we compared expression patterns of key steroidogenic genes (star, cyp19a1a, and cyp11b) normalized by individual reference genes, combinations of reference genes, or total cDNA concentration. All evaluated reference genes displayed notable transcriptional variability across oogenesis, confirming their limited suitability as sole internal controls. In contrast, normalization approaches integrating multiple reference genes and/or total cDNA concentration consistently provided greater stability and more reliable biological interpretation. These results support a refined and more robust normalization framework for transcriptional analyses in fish ovaries, particularly during stages of extensive tissue remodeling. Our findings demonstrate cDNA-based normalization is straightforward, rapid, and easy to implement across laboratories, providing a practical alternative for achieving accurate, reproducible transcript quantification in fish ovary studies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
19.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
3
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
7
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
8
Endocrinology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
Journal of Dairy Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
11
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
14
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
16
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
28
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%