PainWaive: A Consumer-grade Digitally Delivered EEG Neurofeedback Intervention for Chronic Low Back Pain
Hesam-Shariati, N.; Ermolenko, E.; Chowdhury, N.; Zahara, P.; Chen, K. Y.; Lin, C.-T.; Newton-John, T.; Gustin, S.
Show abstract
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is persistent and refractory, affecting 20-30% of population worldwide. Neurofeedback has been explored as a potential non-pharmacological intervention for chronic pain, although evidence in CLBP remains limited. This study evaluated PainWaive, a consumer-grade digitally-delivered neurofeedback intervention targeting multiple pain-related frequency bands recorded over the sensorimotor cortex in individuals with CLBP. In a multiple-baseline experimental design, four participants completed daily assessments of pain severity and pain interference during randomly-assigned baseline phases of 7, 10, 14, and 20 days, followed by 20 sessions of the PainWaive intervention over four weeks. Daily pain assessments continued during the post-intervention and follow-up phases. Participants rated PainWaive's usability and acceptability at post-intervention. Anxiety, depression, wellbeing, and sleep disturbance were assessed at three timepoints. Aggregated Tau-U analyses indicated a large effect (-0.67) on pain severity from baseline to intervention and very large from baseline to post-intervention (-0.92) and follow-up (-0.92) phases. Large effects (-0.63, -0.62, and -0.70) were also observed for pain interference. Individual-level analyses showed significant reductions across all participants, with visual inspection confirming progressive decreases over time. The intervention was rated usable and acceptable by all participants, while psychological outcomes were mixed and varied across participants. The findings provide promising evidence that the PainWaive neurofeedback intervention may reduce pain severity and pain interference in some individuals with CLBP. By prioritising accessibility, usability, and self-administration, PainWaive supports a foundation for more patient-centred, technology-enabled approaches to chronic pain management. Further evaluation of this approach in randomised trials is required to establish efficacy.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real Bodies Not Required? Placebo Analgesia and Pain Perception in Immersive Virtual and Augmented Reality 96%
- Effects of Savoring Meditation on Positive Emotions and Pain-Related Brain Function: A Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis 95%
- Management of Central Post-Stroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Measures of Corticospinal Excitability in Black and Hispanic/Latino People with Painful Peripheral Neuropathy 94%
- Adolescents’ Use of Music for Pain Management 93%
- Motor Learning in Response to Different Experimental Pain Models among Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical interventions targeting the nucleus caudalis for craniofacial pain: a systematic and historical review 93%
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhances emotional bias towards happiness in healthy young adults: A comparative study of electrical and ultrasound stimulation 92%
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.