A grading system of dynamic fibrinolysis resistance in sepsis associates with ICU outcomes
Coupland, L. A.; Frost, S. A.; Lin, J.; Pham, N.; Suryana, E.; Self, M.; Chia, J.; Lam, T.; Liu, Z.; Jaich, R.; Crispin, P.; Rabbolini, D.; Law, R.; Keragala, C.; Medcalf, R.; Aneman, A.
Show abstract
Rationale: Fibrinolysis resistance in sepsis associates with thrombotic burden, multi-organ failure and death. The degrees and dynamics of resistance that associate with mortality in acute sepsis are unknown, and a simple tool to aid clinician interpretation of fibrinolysis measurements is lacking. Objectives: To establish a point of care grading tool of fibrinolysis resistance that aligns with scoring systems for disease acuity, is substantiated by plasma fibrinolysis markers and enables rapid investigation of the fibrinolysis state at the point of care. Methods: Prospective observational study of 116 adult sepsis/septic shock patients with sequential measurements of fibrinolysis resistance during Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission using tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) enhanced viscoelastic testing (VET). The clot lysis time (TPA-LT) adjusted for fibrin clot amplitude (TPA-LT/FIBA10, sec/mm) underwent cluster analysis and was evaluated against disease severity scores, standard pathology, clinical outcomes and fibrinolysis markers. Measurements and Main Results: Three clusters of progressively increasing fibrinolysis resistance were identified (Grades 1-3). At admission, Grade 3 associated with the highest disease severity, organ failure, haematological and biochemical perturbations, fibrinolysis marker inhibitory profile and mortality (42% versus 24% and 15% in Grade 2 and Grade 1, respectively) with a 3.9-fold [95% CI 1.4-11] increased hazard ratio for death at 28 days compared to Grade 1. Transitions between grades were frequent over 7 days with a reduced Grade associated with decreased risk of death. Conclusions: Grading of fibrinolysis resistance in sepsis enables rapid identification of patients at greatest mortality risk with any dynamic improvement corresponding to favourable clinical outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.