Back

Exploring the Impact of a Medical Device Recall on Individuals with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Healthcare Providers: A Qualitative Study

Pendharkar, S.; Blades, K.; Yazji, B.; Ayas, N.; Owens, R.; Kaminska, M.; Mackenzie, C.; Gershon, A.; Ratycz, D.; Lischenko, V.; Fenton, M. E.; McBrien, K.; Povitz, M.; Kendzerska, T.

2026-03-27 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349320 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To understand how the Philips PAP device recall affected patient experiences, clinical practice, and health system responses. Methods: From November 2022 to August 2023, we interviewed individuals with OSA, physicians, respiratory therapists and health system leaders. We also received emailed responses from Health Canada. Interviews explored participants' experiences with the recall announcement and communication, their own responses and perceptions of actions taken by others, the overall impact of the recall and suggestions for improving future recall processes. Interviews were analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. Results: We interviewed 47 participants (16 individuals with OSA, 10 physicians, 17 public or private respiratory therapists, five health system leaders). Themes were organized into four domains: recall communication, execution, participant experiences, and the policy and regulatory context. Participants were confused due to inadequate information from Philips throughout the process. The burden of notifying patients and tracing devices mostly fell to healthcare providers and vendors, while replacement efforts were disorganized and frustrating. Individuals with OSA experienced emotional distress over therapy decisions and difficulties navigating the recall. Healthcare providers described moral distress from being unable to support patients adequately, and vendors faced additional logistical and financial strain. While regulatory authorities reported that Philips followed standard procedures, participants expressed a loss of trust in both the manufacturer and oversight systems. Conclusions: Interviews revealed that poor communication and execution of the Philips recall caused confusion, frustration and significant emotional and financial burden. Collaborative, context-specific strategies are required to improve future recalls.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.4%
3
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
4
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%