Exploring the Impact of a Medical Device Recall on Individuals with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Healthcare Providers: A Qualitative Study
Pendharkar, S.; Blades, K.; Yazji, B.; Ayas, N.; Owens, R.; Kaminska, M.; Mackenzie, C.; Gershon, A.; Ratycz, D.; Lischenko, V.; Fenton, M. E.; McBrien, K.; Povitz, M.; Kendzerska, T.
Show abstract
Purpose: To understand how the Philips PAP device recall affected patient experiences, clinical practice, and health system responses. Methods: From November 2022 to August 2023, we interviewed individuals with OSA, physicians, respiratory therapists and health system leaders. We also received emailed responses from Health Canada. Interviews explored participants' experiences with the recall announcement and communication, their own responses and perceptions of actions taken by others, the overall impact of the recall and suggestions for improving future recall processes. Interviews were analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. Results: We interviewed 47 participants (16 individuals with OSA, 10 physicians, 17 public or private respiratory therapists, five health system leaders). Themes were organized into four domains: recall communication, execution, participant experiences, and the policy and regulatory context. Participants were confused due to inadequate information from Philips throughout the process. The burden of notifying patients and tracing devices mostly fell to healthcare providers and vendors, while replacement efforts were disorganized and frustrating. Individuals with OSA experienced emotional distress over therapy decisions and difficulties navigating the recall. Healthcare providers described moral distress from being unable to support patients adequately, and vendors faced additional logistical and financial strain. While regulatory authorities reported that Philips followed standard procedures, participants expressed a loss of trust in both the manufacturer and oversight systems. Conclusions: Interviews revealed that poor communication and execution of the Philips recall caused confusion, frustration and significant emotional and financial burden. Collaborative, context-specific strategies are required to improve future recalls.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 90%
- Remote-management of COPD: Evaluating Implementation of Digital Innovation to Enable Routine Care (RECEIVER) – Protocol for a feasibility and service adoption observational cohort study 90%
- Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK wide survey 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A clinical trial to evaluate the dayzz smartphone app on employee sleep, health, and productivity at a large US employer 93%
- Evaluating N95 Respirator Designs: A Mixed-Methods Pilot and Feasibility Study 91%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 92%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 90%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 89%
- Expectations and attitudes in primary care towards home-based testing for diagnosing asthma: a mixed methods study 88%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- HEART rate variability biofeedback for LOng Covid symptoms (HEARTLOC): protocol for a feasibility study 92%
- Frontline healthcare workers’ experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal 90%
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.