Back

Predictive value of EEG/ECG Biomarkers for Treatment Response in Depression

Provaznikova, B.; de Bardeci, M.; Altamiranda, E.; Ip, C.-T.; Monn, A.; Weber, S.; Jungwirth, J.; Rohde, J.; Prinz, S.; Kronenberg, G.; Bruehl, A.; Bracht, T.; Olbrich, S.

2026-03-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349315 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Major depressive episodes frequently show limited response to first-line treatments, motivating the search for objective biomarkers. EEG/ECG-based support tools aggregating electrophysiological predictors may guide treatment selection. We examined whether antidepressant treatments concordant with an EEG/ECG-biomarker report were associated with higher response rates. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adults with ICD-10 depressive disorder or bipolar depression treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), (es)ketamine, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) between 2022 and 2024. Resting-state EEG with simultaneous ECG generated individualized biomarker reports with modality-specific response likelihoods. Treatment chosen by clinical teams was classified as concordant or non-concordant; response was derived from routinely collected clinical scales. Results: Among 153 patients (ECT n=53, rTMS n=48, (es)ketamine n=36, SSRIs n=16), response rates were higher for concordant vs non-concordant treatments: ECT 70% vs 50%, rTMS 30% vs 13%, (es)ketamine 31% vs 10%, and SSRIs 100% vs 11%. Overall, 46% (42/92) of concordant vs. 26% (14/54) of non-concordant patients responded (absolute difference +20 percentage points; relative increase {approx}77%; number needed to treat {approx}5). Conclusion: Concordance with EEG/ECG biomarkers correlated with higher treatment response, warranting confirmation in prospective trials. Significance: EEG/ECG-based decision support may enhance antidepressant treatment response in everyday clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
3
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
17
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
18
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
21
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
22
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
23
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
25
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
26
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
27
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
28
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%