Back

National Norms and Psychometrics for the Pubertal Development Scale

Liu, Y.; Bonny, A. E.; Youngstrom, E. A.

2026-03-27 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349307 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: The Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) is widely used for puberty assessment, yet its psychometric properties and norms are limited to research data. This study examined the psychometric properties of parent- and self-report PDS and established continuous norms in nationally representative samples. Methods: We analyzed two deidentified survey samples: a parent-report sample of children aged 6-18 (N=2000, Mage=11.37, 47.2% female, 74.9% White), and a youth self-report sample aged 12-18 (N=754, Mage=14.33, 49.6% female, 75.3% White). Both samples were representative of the U.S. population on key demographics, and the self-report sample consisted entirely of children whose parents also participated in the parent sample, thus creating parent-child dyads. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega. Cross-informant agreement was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC; two-way model, absolute agreement, single unit) and Bland-Altman plots. Age-dependent norms of each sex were established with Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS), with 5th-95th percentile curves and reference tables provided. Results: Parent- and self-report PDS demonstrated acceptable-to-good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.78-0.89; McDonald's omega: 0.79-0.90). Among the 754 parent-youth dyads, excellent cross-informant agreement was observed for both sexes (ICC(2,1)=0.88). Parents' and children's PDS total scores did not differ significantly for boys; for girls, parents rated pubertal development on average 0.13 points lower than children's self-report. Regardless of informants, PDS scores increased nonlinearly with age and exhibited sex-specific developmental patterns. Girls showed earlier pubertal onset, faster progression, and greater convergence toward pubertal completion by late adolescence. Discussion: The PDS demonstrated strong psychometrics in national samples, supporting its utility in the general pediatric population. The national norms provide empirical benchmarks for PDS score interpretation, strengthening its value as a broad estimation of pubertal status and a pre-screening tool for identifying early or delayed puberty.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
8
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
9
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
12
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
13
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
14
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
17
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
18
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
19
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
22
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%