Back

A psychometric evaluation of diffusion basis spectrum imaging indicates white matter inflammation in depression

Kaluza, L.; Kühnel, A.; Kuskova, E.; Studener, K.; Rommel, D.; Lieberz, J.; Kroemer, N. B.

2026-03-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349306 medRxiv
Show abstract

An inflammatory subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with treatment resistance pointing to an unmet need for adjunctive treatments. To evaluate treatment-related changes in brain inflammation, diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) is a promising non-radiation-based technique for longitudinal designs which has been verified with histopathology. However, its use as an endpoint in clinical trials is dependent on its individual-level reliability to robustly track changes. Here, we evaluated two DBSI runs acquired in 94 participants (including 43 participants with MDD) on the same day about 1.5 h apart to assess short-term test-retest reliability. Fiber fraction (reflecting axonal/dendrite density) and hindered fraction (reflecting edema) showed moderate to high test-retest reliability in both gray and white matter regions, whereas restricted fraction (reflecting cellularity) showed lower values in gray and white matter. Group-level reliability was similar in participants with MDD, except for lower reliability of hindered fraction in gray matter. Re-identification rates of individual brain maps were higher using voxel-level white matter signatures compared to gray matter regions of interest (ROIs) (p<.001). Crucially, participants with MDD showed reduced fiber fraction (tmax=4.68, k=38) and elevated hindered fraction (tmax=4.74, k=32) in the cingulate bundle, consistent with increased white matter inflammation, while gray matter ROI-based classification failed to identify cases. We conclude that DBSI is a promising technique to track inflammatory signatures in MDD, particularly in white matter tracts. Since several frontal and subcortical gray matter ROIs showed insufficient reliability, their assessment would require multiple DBSI runs to provide robust estimates.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.9%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
7
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
13
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
20
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%