Back

Bone2Gene: Next-generation Phenotyping of Rare Bone Diseases

Bolmer, E.; Schmidt, P.; Fischer, I.; Rassmann, S.; Ruder, A.; Hustinx, A.; Kirchhoff, A.; Beger, C.; Skaf, K.; Fardipour, M.; Hsieh, T.-C.; Keller, A.; De Rosa, A.; Kalantari, S.; Sirchia, F.; Kotnik, P.; Born, M.; Solomon, B. D.; Waikel, R. L.; Tkemaladze, T.; Abashishvili, L.; Melikidze, E.; Sukhiashvili, A.; Lartsuliani, M.; Nevado, J.; Tenorio, J.; Juergens, J.; Lindschau, M.; Lampe, C.; Moosa, S.; Pantel, J. T.; Mattern, L.; Elbracht, M.; Luk, H.-M.; Travessa, A.; De Victor, J.; Alhashim, M.; Alhashem, A.; AlKaabi, N.; Kocagil, S.; Akbas, E.; Kornak, U.; Rohrer, T.; Pfaeffle, R.; Soucek,

2026-03-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349289 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Diagnosing the over 700 known rare bone diseases (RBDs) is inherently challenging and often requires extensive time and multiple clinical visits. Effective treatment, particularly for RBDs with approved therapies, depends on early and precise identification of the specific RBD type. Image recognition artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to significantly enhance diagnostic processes and improve patient outcomes. Many of these disorders cause characteristic skeletal changes, especially in the hands, and are associated with growth abnormalities. Consequently, affected children routinely undergo hand radiographs for bone age assessment, making these images a widely available yet underutilized diagnostic resource. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively compiled 5,623 multi-institutional hand radiographs from 2,471 patients with 45 different RBDs and 1,382 unaffected controls. We trained two deep learning models: a binary classifier to differentiate between RBD and non-RBD hand radiographs, and a multi-class classifier covering ten RBDs (or RBD groups), using 5-fold cross-validation. Preprocessing included masking, normalization, and data augmentation. Additionally, we applied occlusion sensitivity mapping to visualize class-specific features and evaluated the learned representations through cosine-based retrieval and UMAP projections of the feature space. Results: The affected versus unaffected classifier achieved a balanced accuracy of 85.5% on the test dataset. The ten-class classifier reached a balanced (top-1) accuracy of 76.6%, with top-3 accuracy exceeding 90%. Disorders with highly distinctive phenotypes, such as achondroplasia, achieved accuracies above 95%, whereas phenotypically overlapping disorders, such as ACAN- and SHOX-related short stature, were more frequently confused. Feature space analysis showed that validation samples clustered closely with their respective training distributions, supporting the consistency and generalizability of the learned embeddings. Conclusion: This manuscript presents a proof of principle for the development of Bone2Gene, a next-generation phenotyping (NGP) tool for the detection and differential diagnosis of RBDs, currently based on hand radiographs. Ongoing efforts focus on expanding the dataset to include additional RBDs or RBD groups in the current multi-class classifier for differential diagnosis and to further evaluate its generalizability. The Bone2Gene study is open to collaboration.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
3
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
5
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%