Perceived Factors Influencing Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Risk Assessment and Management: A Cross-Sectional Survey with Service Users and Professionals
Ahmed, N.; Barlow, S.; Reynolds, L.; Drey, N.; Simpson, A.
Show abstract
Abstract Background: Mental health services are shifting towards person-centred care based on collaboration and shared decision making. Yet evidence indicates that these approaches may not be consistently embedded in the assessment and management of risk or safety. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey to examine perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and management with people living with severe mental illness. Questionnaire development and data analysis were guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework, a psychological framework used to identify and understand factors influencing behaviour change. Items were rated on a 5 point Likert scale. In total, 243 service users and mental health professionals completed the survey. Results: Most service users reported that risk or safety had been discussed with them, but only half felt involved in the risk assessment or management process. Two thirds reported not receiving a copy of their risk assessment or management plan. Service users strongly agreed that communication with professionals about risk and safety requires improvement, and that risk is a difficult and emotive topic to discuss. Professionals reported high motivation to involve service users but identified time constraints and service user related factors as key barriers. Principal component analysis identified four components: (1) motivation; (2) social influences and memory/decision making; (3) beliefs about consequences; and (4) team, environment and training factors. More experienced professionals reported fewer negative beliefs about consequences, such as concerns about causing distress or disengagement. Conclusion: Findings highlight the need for clearer communication, organisational support and targeted training to enhance shared decision-making in risk assessment and management practices.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 96%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 96%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 97%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 96%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 96%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 96%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 96%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 96%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 95%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.