Learning Patient-Specific Event Sequence Representations for Clinical Process Analysis
Solyomvari, K.; Antikainen, T.; Moen, H.; Marttinen, P.; Renkonen, R.; Koskinen, M.
Show abstract
Healthcare system performance evaluation is constrained by episodic performance indicators and process mining techniques that fail to accommodate the scale, heterogeneity, and temporal complexity of real-world clinical pathways. Electronic health records enable reconstructing patient journeys that capture how care processes unfold across fragmented healthcare services. Here we present ClinicalTAAT, a time-aware transformer that bridges clinical sequence modeling and process mining by integrating contextual and time-varying information to learn interpretable patient-specific representations from inherently sparse, irregular and high-dimensional clinical event sequences. Evaluated on a large pediatric emergency cohort, ClinicalTAAT outperforms existing models in acuity and diagnosis classification, identifies clinically meaningful patient subgroups in heterogenous population with distinct acuity, resource utilization and diagnostic patterns, and detects anomalies in individual care trajectories. These findings demonstrate that time-aware transformers can complement existing process mining methodologies and serve as foundation models for clinical process analysis, providing a scalable framework for data-driven healthcare evaluation and optimization.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating Treatment Effects for Time-to-Treatment Antibiotic Stewardship in Sepsis 94%
- COSIME: Cooperative multi-view integration with Scalable and Interpretable Model Explainer 92%
- Generalized Radiograph Representation Learning via Cross-supervision between Images and Free-text Radiology Reports 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.