Back

Identification of a microRNA with a mutation in the loop structure in the silkworm Bombyx mori

Harada, M.; Tabara, M.; Kuriyama, K.; Ito, K.; Bono, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Nakano, M.; Fukuhara, T.; Toyoda, A.; Fujiyama, A.; Tabunoki, H.

2026-03-27 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.24.714027 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play essential roles in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression in organisms. In the process of synthesizing mature miRNAs from miRNA precursors, the miRNA precursors are cleaved via Dicer at their loop structure, after which the miRNA precursors become mature and regulate transcription. However, the consequences of altering the loop sequence are not fully understood. The silkworm Bombyx mori is a lepidopteran insect with many genetic strains. We identified a mutant of the miRNA miR-3260 whose the part of the loop structure was lacking in a silkworm strain with translucent larval skin. Here, we aimed to analyze the role of wild-type miR-3260 and the influence of the mutation of the loop structure in B. mori. First, we identified the genomic region responsible for the translucent larval skin phenotype and determined that the mutated miR-3260 nucleotide sequences. Then, we predicted the binding partners of wild-type miR-3260 using the RNA hybrid tool and found two juvenile hormone (JH)-related genes as targets of wild-type miR-3260. Next, we assessed the relationships between miR-3260 and JH and found that miR-3260 was highly expressed in the Corpora allata and its expression responded to JH treatment. Meanwhile, miR-3260 mimic and inhibitor did not induce the typical phenotypes associated with JH in B. mori. Then, we compared the dicing products from wild-type and mutant miR-3260 precursors and observed that neither form underwent Dicer-mediated cleavage when the loop structure was altered. These results suggest that loop mutations in the miR-3260 precursor may not influence dicing activity, consistent with the lack of observable phenotypic effects.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
3
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
5
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
7
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
9
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Insect Molecular Biology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Development, Growth & Differentiation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
28
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%