Back

Reducing the Foreign Body Reaction to Neuronal Implants in the Central Nervous System with Porous Precision-templated, Mechanically Compliant Hydrogel Scaffolds

Dryg, I.; Zhen, L.; Darrow, R.; Lawton, S.; Crawford, L.; Robinson, R.; Perlmutter, S.; Bryers, J. D.; Ratner, B.

2026-03-26 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.24.713981 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) disease or injury might be treated by implanted devices, tissue regenerative scaffolds, or drug delivery platforms. However, inflammatory CNS responses limit these interventions and may worsen outcomes following damage to the CNS. Via the foreign body reaction (FBR), macrophages and glial cells trigger a "glial scar" around implants, reducing device performance, scaffold regenerative ability, or drug delivery potential. Previous studies have shown that stiffness of CNS implants significantly affects glial encapsulation, but few studies have investigated materials that truly match brain tissue stiffness. Porous precision-templated scaffolds (PTS) with uniform, interconnected, 40 {micro}m pores have shown favorable healing outcomes and a reduced FBR in numerous soft and hard tissue applications. To quantify the effects of both hydrogel compliance (stiffness) and pore size on glial encapsulation, we implanted poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-glycerol methacrylate) (pHEMA/GMA) PTS of varying stiffness and pore size for 4 weeks in rat brain. We observed reduced astrocyte encapsulation around PTS compared to solid hydrogel rods, reduced pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization for softer hydrogels versus stiffer hydrogels, and the presence of neuronal markers and neurogenesis within the pores. Utilizing soft, precision-porous hydrogels could provide a strategy for mitigating glial scarring and improving implant-based CNS treatments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.2%
3
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
9
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
17
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.7%
20
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
22
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%